es. The only way we finally got a
> whole lot
>> of this to finally work was thru our TAM and whatever that support
> team is
>> called. They spent days at our site trying to get it to work.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would hope most sites aren't as fundamental
tations to
> communicate with the server.
>
> Then I’d start trying to deploy the secondary sites.
>
> From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:54 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: RE: Patch management, revisited
>
> Ray - you
e secondary sites.
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Patch management, revisited
Ray - you make a good point. We're covering 13 locations across the US,
with varying WAN connectivity. A
e seems to be endless
variations on how, and how often, you want the workstations to communicate
with the server.
Then I'd start trying to deploy the secondary sites.
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subj
ing amount of power.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
>
>
>
> If you don't do third party patches, SCCM is _alm
M
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
If you don't do third party patches, SCCM is _almost_ exactly like WSUS. It
is based on the WSUS engine as a matter of fact, and you have to install
WSUS on the Software Update Point. J
Doing the SCCM installation can
uary 04, 2011 4:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE: Patch management, revisited
Do you ever run into any problems with SCCM clients where folks have done
supernetting of AD Sites?
Our SSCM guys are scared of it because they were told it could be problematic
but we're tired
ichael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 11:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE: Patch management, revisited
So, I wouldn't do anything without a few hours of discovery.
But if you are just going to use it for patch management, say three days (worst
.aspx
WakeUp eliminates close to 99% of client health issues.
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
You are being too kind J
That said, once up, the
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
You teach SCCM classes? Good to know, because I can't even get it to install
- it dies at "Setup failed to install SMS provider:" error which IIRC means
I need to do some setspn thing.
Dave
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smith
And there ya go.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
http://social.technet.microsoft.com
M and
upgrade our old SMS environment.
Dave
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
Like I said - it can be a little finicky to install. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultan
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/configmgrsetup/thread/d06a6
b81-68d0-466a-8382-ceb7fb0bb8c3/
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
Like I said - it
Like I said - it can be a little finicky to install. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
ithcons.com]>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 10:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
If you don't do third party patches, SCCM is _almost_ exactly like WSUS. It is
based on the WSUS engine as a matter of fact, and you have to install WSUS on
the Softwa
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RE: Patch management, revisited
Sure.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:40 PM
To: NT S
ael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Patch management, revisited
"SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to dedicat
Sure.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Patch management, revisited
Also, if we wanted to start with WSUS and then
Also, if we wanted to start with WSUS and then migrate to SCCM down the
road, is that realistically feasible?
Jonathan - Thumb typed from my HTC Droid Incredible (and yes, it really is)
on the Verizon network.
On Feb 4, 2011 2:36 PM, "Jonathan" wrote:
> "SCCM works very well if you have the time
"SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to dedicate to it. I
have about 1,000 PCs/ laptops here and tried SCCM, but never had the time to
dedicate to it. And it was a real a pain to manage when you have limited
time. But, it can be a great product and has flexibility. I wasn't willing
,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Patch management, revisited
SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to d
Not correcting - just clarifying. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Patch management, revisited
I stand corrected
riday, February 04, 2011 2:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: Patch management, revisited
how does sccm handle clients that are not joined to active directory?
Jonathan - Thumb typed from my HTC Droid Incredible (and yes, it really is) on
the Verizon network.
On Feb 4, 2011 2:02 PM, &qu
Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Patch management, revisited
SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to dedicate to it. I
y can also be
any PC (workstation) or server with an agent.
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
> From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:58 PM
> To: NT System Admi
System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Patch management, revisited
SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to dedicate to it. I have
about 1,000 PCs/laptops here and tried SCCM, but never had the time to dedicate
to it. And it was a real a pain to manage when you have limited time. But
SCCM works very well if you have the time and staff to dedicate to it. I have
about 1,000 PCs/laptops here and tried SCCM, but never had the time to dedicate
to it. And it was a real a pain to manage when you have limited time. But, it
can be a great product and has flexibility. I wasn't wil
Just my opinion, but based on your requirements, SCCM is still the leading
candidate - and I have experience with all of them. KACE may come close, IF
the number of end-points is closer to 700 than 2000.
One of the HUGE factors that you need to also consider is the amount of
support you will g
If you don't do third party patches, SCCM is _almost_ exactly like WSUS. It is
based on the WSUS engine as a matter of fact, and you have to install WSUS on
the Software Update Point. :)
Doing the SCCM installation can be a little finicky; but once you set it up -
it just RUNS.
The challenge w
29 matches
Mail list logo
