RE: gpupdate/GPO

2009-01-04 Thread Jason Gauthier
he administrative level and am executing "gpupdate /target:computer /force" in it. This should help get it down to the 'next' reboot, as I discovered in my testing. Thanks a lot, all. Jason From: MarvinC [mailto:marv...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 5:32 P

Re: gpupdate/GPO

2009-01-02 Thread Tom Miller
Are you using the "enforced" option? >>> "Jason Gauthier" 12/31/2008 3:07 PM >>> All, I have one, or many, GPOs that are not apparently being applied on workstations. Through some testing, I have specifically found that IE settings are not really taking effect. That is, until, I manual

Re: gpupdate/GPO

2009-01-01 Thread MarvinC
Test a workstation by running gpupdate /force /sync and continue with the reboot. If the policy still doesn't apply then make sure that pc is communicating with its local DC. Run gpresult to see what policies, if any are being applied on a test workstation. Download the GPOTool and install it to

Re: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jason Gauthier wrote: > I have one, or many, GPOs that are not apparently being applied on > workstations. Through some testing, I have specifically found that IE > settings are not really taking effect. That is, until, I manually run a > gpupdate /force, and th

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Jason Gauthier
llouts.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: gpupdate/GPO I would think IE settings wouldn't need a reboot... Many programs can try to adjust IE settings. AV programs, Spybot, Desktop Search, etc... could anything be overwriting the settings yo

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Sam Cayze
er 31, 2008 2:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: gpupdate/GPO When you say "the NIC has not come active" are you talking about the PC/drivers, etc.. or are you talking about the time it might take the switch to bring the link up? I know some switches take longer than XP to

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Jason Gauthier
Admin Issues Subject: RE: gpupdate/GPO Not all GPO's are applied in a background refresh. Many do require a reboot to take effect, Offline files being one for example. The GPO would not apply in the initial reboot because the computer does not get the update since the NIC has not come a

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread gsweers
NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: gpupdate/GPO Wouldn't that group policy not get applied under that theory though? Or any new GP at all? Furthermore, the GPO should be reset every 15 minutes, however some settings are not actually applied until the force+reboot. From: gswe...@act

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Jason Gauthier
g.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: gpupdate/GPO On occasion it takes 2 reboot cycles for GPO's to be applied. You can help mitigate that by making the computer wait for network on startup under the computer section, System/Group Po

RE: gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread gsweers
equiring a 2nd reboot to get the gp settings to take effect. From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauth...@lastar.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: gpupdate/GPO All, I have one, or many, GPOs that are not apparently being applied on wo

gpupdate/GPO

2008-12-31 Thread Jason Gauthier
All, I have one, or many, GPOs that are not apparently being applied on workstations. Through some testing, I have specifically found that IE settings are not really taking effect. That is, until, I manually run a gpupdate /force, and the reboot or logoff. Obviously, this is not reall