Probably not that the solution you want but there is a '1st Seat Payment
Plan' that includes the initial maintenance/'tax'.
In the end an Indie version is still missing.
On 2 August 2016 at 11:02, Feli di Giorgio wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Nathan Dunsworth
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Nathan Dunsworth
> wrote:
>
> Please turn in your nuke card for giving them the idea Adlm like services is
> cool.
>
> The way everyone has gone about it is utter fail. When somebody can make a
> flex like server talk to a
Yes I'd like that
Howard
> On 1 Aug 2016, at 9:02 pm, Feli di Giorgio wrote:
>
> Still hoping for a subscription version of Nuke like Flame or Creative Cloud.
>
> Feli
>
>
>
> www.felidigiorgio.com
Please turn in your nuke card for giving them the idea Adlm like
services is cool.
The way everyone has gone about it is utter fail. When somebody can make a
flex like server talk to a monthership and not have it be per artist
workstation that does the sign in and negotiations then we can talk.
Still hoping for a subscription version of Nuke like Flame or Creative Cloud.
Feli
www.felidigiorgio.comfe...@earthlink.net
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Marten Blumen wrote:
>
> Maybe 'maintenance' should be
Maybe 'maintenance' should be called a 'compositing tax'.
On 2 August 2016 at 06:02, Howard Jones wrote:
> I agree with Simon, the emphasis has been one sided and maintenance isn’t
> cheap. 10 does feel like a 9.5 though as far as Nuke goes.
>
>
> On 1 Aug 2016, at 18:57,
I agree with Simon, the emphasis has been one sided and maintenance isn’t
cheap. 10 does feel like a 9.5 though as far as Nuke goes.
> On 1 Aug 2016, at 18:57, Deke Kincaid wrote:
>
> The perception may be that because of Foundry marketing was all about Nuke
> Studio.
The perception may be that because of Foundry marketing was all about Nuke
Studio. When you drill down to the feature list there were plenty in 9.0.
Also lots of invisible changes to the surface around aggressively trying to
speed it up. Then 10.0 is really like a 9.5 as it was just fixing the
One thing I think would be useful is if the Foundry went back to issueing beta
licences. Then they would widen out the product for better testing. I am not
buying NS until it proves itself useful but that shouldn’t mean I can’t beta
test it.
I don’t know why they changed the set up but they
Yup - but it's just a phase IMO, like Flame/Inferno was in the 2000's. It
was a really well supported product for many years before then, then went
bad for approximately 10 years, as corporate made as much money as possible
without many updates, then went back to being good as the executives were
Great, thanks for bringing that up that bug-fix Deke :)!
One thing with this thread that really worries me is that all focus seems
to be on Nuke Studio. Personally I don't use Nuke Studio. From what I
understand there's a huge amount of problems with it and they should
definitely be fixed. But
11 matches
Mail list logo