Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Baking the trackers also has the benefit of avoiding the 'recalculating keyframes' dialog, which can occur when you leave the 'Tracker4' in the node stream. On 25 October 2015 at 01:17, Daniel Hartlehnert wrote: > Ah thats a good one Howard, thanks! > > Am 24.10.2015 um 13:52

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

That "recalculating keyframes" only shows up if you have the little thumbnail previews turned on. If you turn that off then that dialog doesn't pop up anymore. On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Marten Blumen wrote: > Baking the trackers also has the benefit of avoiding the

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

One other is you have tracked lots of trackers around one point - to reduce noise, and then do the similar for 3 other areas. Then if you average the 4 groups you can then select them to create a corner pin which only allows 4 trackers. I used to have a tool to do just that but now its much

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Hi Ian, i am fully aware of the benefit of averaging several Trackers in order for them to hopefully cancel out each others noise. I just don't see why you would want to create a new averaged tracker. You already have the averaged transform data in the Tracker Node transform tab when all

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Ah thats a good one Howard, thanks! Am 24.10.2015 um 13:52 schrieb Howard Jones: > One other is you have tracked lots of trackers around one point - to reduce > noise, and then do the similar for 3 other areas. > Then if you average the 4 groups you can then select them to create a corner >

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

If you want to bake to a cornerpin or a transform? It's a lot faster then typing an expression? ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Hi Daniel, It can average out the noise that distracts individual tracks, giving you a cleaner track. Think of it like the track equivalent of a temporal blur. Best, Ian > El oct 23, 2015, a las 4:42 AM, Daniel Hartlehnert escribió: > > Hi, > > maybe i am missing

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

So you can use it elsewhere for one. > On 23 Oct 2015, at 12:42, Daniel Hartlehnert wrote: > > Hi, > > maybe i am missing something, but i don't really understand the usefulness of > the "average tracks" button in the tracker. > I know what it does, but isn't that the same as

[Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Hi, maybe i am missing something, but i don't really understand the usefulness of the "average tracks" button in the tracker. I know what it does, but isn't that the same as having the T, R and S buttons activated for each individual tracker? They will get averaged as well to calculate the

Re: [Nuke-users] Tracker averaging?

Here is my workflow (though this was more necessary before degraining became so good):  If I had a really noise plate, and my tracker was jumping around a lot, due to the grain, I would track the same feature a minimum of 3 times with 3 different trackers (1 node).  because they are started on