Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread Howard Jones
Etherington james.ethering...@gmail.com To: Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk Sent: Tue, 8 March, 2011 16:17:51 Subject: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts Hello, Does anyone else find that you get a faint crosshatch artifact when you scale up an image in NUKE? I've tried using

RE: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread luc julien
try my gizmo call transform_qlt on nukepedia. http://www.nukepedia.com/gizmos/transform_qlt/ I use the filtering of the furnace, you will need nukex Luc Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:41:35 + From: mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts To: nuke-users

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread chris
i did quite extensive tests after the last discussion, and found that cubic is a rather poor filter for my kind of work (scanned film stock) and my taste. i personally really, *really* miss the sinc filter in shake, specially for downscaling - i found no way i could get the same results as easy

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread Deke Kincaid
Look for a thread called 'Grid pattern in transform' around March 2010 in the archives. Here are my obligatory repost links from Jonathan's explanation on the subject. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_frequency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_limit -deke On Mar 8, 2011, at

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread James Etherington
Cheers for all the responses! On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Deke Kincaid dekekinc...@gmail.com wrote: Look for a thread called 'Grid pattern in transform' around March 2010 in the archives. Here are my obligatory repost links from Jonathan's explanation on the subject. :)