Re: [Nuke-users] displacegeo not updating

2011-03-08 Thread david yu
Yeah that trick works but its really a pain to work like this. On 3/3/11 4:17 PM, nuke.art...@mac.com wrote: Yeah had this before. Try disabling/activating the roto and see if it updates. Sebastian Am 03.03.2011 um 06:14 schrieb david yu davi...@roadrunner.com.ph

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread Howard Jones
This has been discussed before and it's apparently correct - however Shake used to hide it from you. Try a 1 pixel blur before the transform might fix it but give you a slightly softer shake style transform If memory serves me right... howard From: James

RE: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread luc julien
try my gizmo call transform_qlt on nukepedia. http://www.nukepedia.com/gizmos/transform_qlt/ I use the filtering of the furnace, you will need nukex Luc Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:41:35 + From: mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts To:

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread chris
i did quite extensive tests after the last discussion, and found that cubic is a rather poor filter for my kind of work (scanned film stock) and my taste. i personally really, *really* miss the sinc filter in shake, specially for downscaling - i found no way i could get the same results as easy

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread Deke Kincaid
Look for a thread called 'Grid pattern in transform' around March 2010 in the archives. Here are my obligatory repost links from Jonathan's explanation on the subject. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_frequency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_limit -deke On Mar 8, 2011, at

Re: [Nuke-users] scaling artifacts

2011-03-08 Thread James Etherington
Cheers for all the responses! On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Deke Kincaid dekekinc...@gmail.com wrote: Look for a thread called 'Grid pattern in transform' around March 2010 in the archives. Here are my obligatory repost links from Jonathan's explanation on the subject. :)

Re: [Nuke-users] Cancel Nuke processing with keyboard?

2011-03-08 Thread Howard Jones
True - as long as you don't dock the progress panel. From: Alan Fairlie alanfair...@optusnet.com.au To: Nuke user discussion nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk Sent: Tue, 8 March, 2011 22:09:02 Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Cancel Nuke processing with keyboard?

RE: [Nuke-users] Cancel Nuke processing with keyboard?

2011-03-08 Thread John Cairns
Thanks guys, unfortunately the enter/return works if the progress window has focus, but on my Linux it doesn't automatically focus to that window when I start tracking (the focus stays under the cursor). Aside from changing my OS's window behaviour, is there any way to tap into that progress

Re: [Nuke-users] Cancel Nuke processing with keyboard?

2011-03-08 Thread Tom Piedmont
Considering how fast the tracker *can* fly off into the vast beyond -and keep on going, it has always needed far greater stopping power, however it is implemented. A shortcut key such as escape is simply too obvious an option. Neverminding that the progress bar randomly chooses a different

Re: [Nuke-users] Cancel Nuke processing with keyboard?

2011-03-08 Thread Johan Aberg
You can override specific windows/dialogs behaviour under Linux. For instance, you can have the progress window to always appear under the mouse. Go to 'Window Specific Settings' You can identify the progress window using the 'Detect' button