On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 12:35 -0400, Sasha wrote:
> > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know
> > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
> > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
>
> Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the
I've got to say +1 for Float64 too. I write a lot of numpy code, and
this bites me at least once a week. You'd think I'd learn better, but
it's just so easy to screw this up when you have to switch back and
forth between matlab (which I'm forced to TA) and numpy (which I use for
Real Work).
Is there some way, either within numpy or at build-time, to verify
you're using BLAS/LAPACK? Is there one we should be using?
...Eric
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 11:19 -0600, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Joris De Ridder wrote:
> > Just to be sure, what exactly is affected when one uses the
ort of behavior.
...Eric
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:27 +0200, Joris De Ridder wrote:
>
> On Friday 02 June 2006 14:58, Eric Jonas wrote:
>[EJ]: Hello! I've been using numeric for a while, and the recent list
> traffic
>[EJ]: prompted me to finally migrate
Hello! I've been using numeric for a while, and the recent list traffic
prompted me to finally migrate all my old code. On a whim, we were
benchmarking numpy vs numeric and have been lead to the conclusion that
numpy is at least 50x slower; a 1000x1000 matmul takes 16 sec in numpy
but 300 ms in num
