On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:37:55AM -0400, A. M. Archibald wrote:
> Would it be useful for me to contribute the tiny script I wrote to
> trigger it as a regression test?
>
> A. M. Archibald
>
> from numpy import vectorize, zeros
>
> vt = vectorize(lambda *args: args)
> # Removing either of the fo
On 04/10/06, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, a segfault would be problematic. Otherwise, it works and is in fact faster
than what I wrote.
It's a bit tricky to trigger but I think it was fixed in 1.0rc1 (in
changeset 3125, in fact:
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/3
A. M. Archibald wrote:
> On 03/10/06, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has anyone implemented an easier or more efficient way to broadcast arrays
>> to a
>> common shape at the Python level? I was hoping that the broadcast iterator
>> would
>> actually provide the broadcasted arrays, but
On 03/10/06, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone implemented an easier or more efficient way to broadcast arrays to
> a
> common shape at the Python level? I was hoping that the broadcast iterator
> would
> actually provide the broadcasted arrays, but it does not.
How about vecto
Has anyone implemented an easier or more efficient way to broadcast arrays to a
common shape at the Python level? I was hoping that the broadcast iterator would
actually provide the broadcasted arrays, but it does not.
I've attached my best pure-Python effort.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to b
