Rolf Wester wrote:
> David Grant wrote:
>
>> A factor of 2! Is that short for a factor of **2?
>>
>>
> That means Numeric/weave takes about 17 s (on my PC), and the
> numby/weave version takes about 32 s.
>
Please show your code. There are several factors that have changed
here. Fo
David Grant wrote:
> A factor of 2! Is that short for a factor of **2?
>
That means Numeric/weave takes about 17 s (on my PC), and the
numby/weave version takes about 32 s.
--
# Dr. Rolf Wester
# Fraunhofer Institut f. Lasertechnik
# Steinbachstrasse 15, D-
A factor of 2! Is that short for a factor of **2?On 7/27/06, Rolf Wester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Hello,I have a program using Numeric and weave developed with
Python2.3. Ijust switched to Python2.4 and numpy. The Numeric/weave version isalmost a factor of 2 faster compared to numpy/weave. Is th
Hello,
I have a program using Numeric and weave developed with Python2.3. I
just switched to Python2.4 and numpy. The Numeric/weave version is
almost a factor of 2 faster compared to numpy/weave. Is that what is to
be expected or are there options to improve the speed of numpy/weave? I
would
