Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Travis Oliphant
Sasha wrote: >I would like to add my voice to a call for single prefix (I like >PyArray_ for everything, but can live with npy_). Presumably npy_ >vs. NPY_ variation is supposed to distinguish between macros and C >language elements, but as long as the stem is properly capitalized, I >don't see

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Sasha
I would like to add my voice to a call for single prefix (I like PyArray_ for everything, but can live with npy_). Presumably npy_ vs. NPY_ variation is supposed to distinguish between macros and C language elements, but as long as the stem is properly capitalized, I don't see a problem of using

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Travis Oliphant
Russell E. Owen wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>3) C-API names have prefix PyArray_ (like always), NPY_ or npy_. >> >> The NPY_ and npy_ prefixes are new and were done to remove the >> likelihood of name collisions when NumPy is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Travis Oliphant
Christian Kristukat wrote: >Travis Oliphant ieee.org> writes: > > > >>Some of you may have noticed that things have been changing rapidly in >>the NumPy world (if you were out of the office in June then all the >>activity may seem overwhelming). >> >>All of this activity is based on the fact

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) C-API names have prefix PyArray_ (like always), NPY_ or npy_. > >The NPY_ and npy_ prefixes are new and were done to remove the >likelihood of name collisions when NumPy is used with another >library.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-10 Thread Christian Kristukat
Charles R Harris gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > On 7/9/06, Robert Kern gmail.com> wrote: > Christian Kristukat wrote:> Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:>>> I believe that Debian recently changed its configuration to default to > >> /usr/local (for good reason!). Perhaps that is causing what

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi,On 7/9/06, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Kristukat wrote:> Robert Kern gmail.com> writes:>>> I believe that Debian recently changed its configuration to default to >> /usr/local (for good reason!). Perhaps that is causing what you see.>> I just found out that this is feature/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Robert Kern
Christian Kristukat wrote: > Robert Kern gmail.com> writes: > >> I believe that Debian recently changed its configuration to default to >> /usr/local (for good reason!). Perhaps that is causing what you see. > > I just found out that this is feature/bug of opensuse 10.1. I'm beginning to > like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Christian Kristukat
Robert Kern gmail.com> writes: > I believe that Debian recently changed its configuration to default to > /usr/local (for good reason!). Perhaps that is causing what you see. > I just found out that this is feature/bug of opensuse 10.1. I'm beginning to like it but can you tell what you have t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Robert Kern
Christian Kristukat wrote: > Travis Oliphant ieee.org> writes: > >> Some of you may have noticed that things have been changing rapidly in >> the NumPy world (if you were out of the office in June then all the >> activity may seem overwhelming). >> >> All of this activity is based on the fact

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Christian Kristukat
Travis Oliphant ieee.org> writes: > > > Some of you may have noticed that things have been changing rapidly in > the NumPy world (if you were out of the office in June then all the > activity may seem overwhelming). > > All of this activity is based on the fact that the upcoming beta releas

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-09 Thread Gary Ruben
Hi Travis, My suggestion: Because you said you want to do a feature freeze, this should be pretty easy to handle. Wait for a feature freeze point then create a 1.0 branch. From then, new stuff can continue going into the trunk. Bug fixes go into the trunk and the 1.0 branch. Gary R. Travis Ol

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-08 Thread Travis Oliphant
Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi Travis, > > Are you going to make a development branch so other things can > continue going into Numpy until the 1.0 release? Something like that is a good idea. I'm open to suggestions... -Travis --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-08 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Travis,Are you going to make a development branch so other things can continue going into Numpy until the 1.0 release?ChuckOn 7/8/06, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Saturday 08 July 2006 4:04 am, Stephan Tolksdorf wrote: > Hi Travis,>> thanks for putting all the effort into NumPy.>>  

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Dale
On Saturday 08 July 2006 4:04 am, Stephan Tolksdorf wrote: > Hi Travis, > > thanks for putting all the effort into NumPy. > > > Unless there is a serious issue pointed out, the only thing that should > > be changed at this point are bug-fixes, documentation strings, and added > > tests. Once 1.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy beta release plan

2006-07-08 Thread Stephan Tolksdorf
Hi Travis, thanks for putting all the effort into NumPy. > Unless there is a serious issue pointed out, the only thing that should > be changed at this point are bug-fixes, documentation strings, and added > tests. Once 1.0b1 is released nothing but those things can be added. The beginning o