Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Tim Hochberg wrote:
>
>
>>> That would be easy to do. Right now the opcodes should work correctly
>>> on data that is spaced in multiples of the itemsize on the last axis.
>>> Other arrays are copied (no opcode required, it's embedd
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> En/na Tim Hochberg ha escrit::
>
>
>> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>
>>> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
>>> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which can
>>> be seen with the following code
En/na Tim Hochberg ha escrit::
> Tim Hochberg wrote:
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since
> r1977 or
> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems
> which can
> be seen with the following code::
Tim Hochberg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>That would be easy to do. Right now the opcodes should work correctly
>>on data that is spaced in multiples of the itemsize on the last axis.
>>Other arrays are copied (no opcode required, it's embedded at the top
>>of interp_body lines 64-80). The reco
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> David M. Cooke wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:19:08 -0700
>> Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>>
It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since
r1977 or
so, but I have come across some alig
En/na Tim Hochberg ha escrit::
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
>> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which can
>> be seen with the following code::
> I looked at this just a little bit and clearl
Tim Hochberg wrote:
>David M. Cooke wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:19:08 -0700
>>Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
so, but I have co
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:23:25 -0700
Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 October 2006 10:13, Tim Hochberg wrote:
> > Sebastian Haase wrote:
> > > Quick question hopefully somewhat related to this:
> > > Does numexpr fully support float32 arrays ?
> >
> > I don't recall. At on
David M. Cooke wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:19:08 -0700
> Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
>>
>>> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
>>> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which c
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:19:08 -0700
Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> > It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
> > so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which can
> > be seen with the following code::
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which can
> be seen with the following code::
I looked at this just a little bit and clearly this bit from interp_body
cannot wor
Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Quick question hopefully somewhat related to this:
> Does numexpr fully support float32 arrays ?
>
I don't recall. At one point there was a tentative plan to support
float32 by casting them a block at a time to float64, operating on them
and them casting them back. Tha
Quick question hopefully somewhat related to this:
Does numexpr fully support float32 arrays ?
-Sebastian
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 09:32, Tim Hochberg wrote:
> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> > It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
> > so, but I have come acr
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> It seemed that discontiguous arrays worked OK in Numexpr since r1977 or
> so, but I have come across some alignment or striding problems which can
> be seen with the following code::
>
> import numpy
> import numexpr
>
> array_length = 10
> array_desc
14 matches
Mail list logo
