Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I can verify that this now works with numpy 1.0b1 on Python 2.3. The
> change was using an updated Pyrex for generating mtrand.c (it no longer
> calls PyLong_AsUnsignedLong on integer objects as it did before).
>
>
Scratch that. I meant it works with latest numpy (w
Gary Ruben wrote:
> See below:
>
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> Gary Ruben wrote:
>>
>>> Should
>>> >>> seed(1)
>>> act the same as
>>> >>> seed(array([1]))
>>> in the random module?
>>>
>> No. They use slightly different mechanisms to seed. The integer uses
>> RandomKit's
>> seeding
Gary Ruben wrote:
> See below:
>
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> Gary Ruben wrote:
>>
>>> Should
>>> >>> seed(1)
>>> act the same as
>>> >>> seed(array([1]))
>>> in the random module?
>>>
>> No. They use slightly different mechanisms to seed. The integer uses
>> RandomKit's
>> seeding
See below:
Robert Kern wrote:
> Gary Ruben wrote:
>> Should
>> >>> seed(1)
>> act the same as
>> >>> seed(array([1]))
>> in the random module?
>
> No. They use slightly different mechanisms to seed. The integer uses
> RandomKit's
> seeding routine. I borrowed Python's mechanism for seeding fr
Gary Ruben wrote:
> Should
> >>> seed(1)
> act the same as
> >>> seed(array([1]))
> in the random module?
No. They use slightly different mechanisms to seed. The integer uses
RandomKit's
seeding routine. I borrowed Python's mechanism for seeding from an array of
integers. Now that it comes up
