Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

Steven G. Johnson wrote: > Andrew Jaffe wrote: >> numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are >> actually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of >> the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numbers with the frequencies >> as in rfftfreq (i.e., two r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

Andrew Jaffe wrote: > numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are > actually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of > the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numbers with the frequencies > as in rfftfreq (i.e., two real numbers at the same frequen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

On 9/7/06, Andrew Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Charles,Charles R Harris wrote:> On 9/7/06, *Andrew Jaffe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:>> Hi all,>> It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently.>> numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and las

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

Hi Charles, Charles R Harris wrote: > On 9/7/06, *Andrew Jaffe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently. > > numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are > actually r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

On 9/7/06, Andrew Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,It seems that scipy and numpy define rfft differently.numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers areactually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numb