Re: [Numpy-discussion] Array blitting (pasting one array into another)

This is a useful idea certainly. I would recommended extending it to an arbitrary number of axes. You could either raise an error if the ndim of the two arrays are unequal, or allow a broadcast of a lesser ndimmed src array. - Joe On Jun 29, 2017 20:17, "Mikhail V" wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] proposed changes to array printing in 1.14

To add to Allan's message: point (2), the printing of 0-d arrays, is the one that is the most important in the sense that it rectifies a really strange situation, where the printing cannot be logically controlled by the same mechanism that controls >=1-d arrays (see PR). While point 3 can also be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

> Convert the doctest in `numpy/lib/tests/test_polynomial.py` to regular tests. Might be tricky as it mostly checks print formatting. Port scipy's refguide-check and enhance/fix/improve code examples in docstrings? Also somewhat janitorial though. ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 29.06.2017 klo 20:45: > Here's a random idea: how about building a NumPy gallery? > scikit-{image,learn} has it, and while those projects may have more > visual datasets, I can imagine something along the lines of Nicolas > Rougier's beautiful book: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017, at 11:09, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I will be running the NumPy sprint at Scipy 2017 and I'm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017, at 11:09, Charles R Harris wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote:>> I will be running the NumPy sprint at > Scipy 2017 and I'm trying to >> put together a suitable list of things to sprint on. In my >> experience,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I will be running the NumPy sprint at Scipy 2017 and I'm trying to put > together a suitable list of things to sprint on. In my experience, > sprinting on NumPy is hard, enhancements generally

[Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

Hi All, I will be running the NumPy sprint at Scipy 2017 and I'm trying to put together a suitable list of things to sprint on. In my experience, sprinting on NumPy is hard, enhancements generally need lengthy review and even finding and doing simple bug fixes can take time. What I have in mind