Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY problems with PGI compilers

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > On 08/14/2017 03:51 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> I'm definitely at a lose here. I have no idea how to make F2PY work with >> the PGI compilers. I'm beginning to think F2PY is completely borked unless >> you use

Re: [Numpy-discussion] quantile() or percentile()

+1 on quantile() -CHB On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Eric Wieser > wrote: > >> Let’s try and keep this on topic - most replies to this message has been >> about #9211,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY problems with PGI compilers

On 08/14/2017 10:19 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: On 08/14/2017 03:51 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: I'm definitely at a lose here. I have no idea how to make F2PY work with the PGI compilers. I'm beginning to think F2PY is completely borked unless you use the defaults (gcc). That's not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY problems with PGI compilers

On 08/14/2017 10:27 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: On 08/14/2017 04:05 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: Ralf Gommers kirjoitti 14.08.2017 klo 09:51: I'm definitely at a lose here. I have no idea how to make F2PY work with the PGI compilers. I'm beginning to think F2PY is completely borked

Re: [Numpy-discussion] F2PY problems with PGI compilers

On 08/14/2017 03:51 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: I'm definitely at a lose here. I have no idea how to make F2PY work with the PGI compilers. I'm beginning to think F2PY is completely borked unless you use the defaults (gcc). That's not the case. Here is an example when using the