On 05/24/2018 11:31 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> I also somewhat like the idea of taking it out (once we have a first
> replacement) in the case that we have a plan to do a better/lower level
> replacement at a later point within numpy.
> Removal generally has its merits, but if a (mid term)
Hi Jaime,
On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:01:40 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote:
> I will be there tomorrow for sure, though. What time do you plan on
> starting?
Thanks for the heads-up. We'll probably start around 9:30am. We're at
190 Doe Library on Berkeley campus.
We started today by
Hi Nathan,
On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:13:16 -0500, Nathan Goldbaum wrote:
> I see listed on the scipy.org site that the preferred citation for NumPy is
> the "Guide to NumPy":
>
> https://www.scipy.org/citing.html
>
> This could work for what I'm writing, but I'd prefer to find a citation
>
Hi all,
I see listed on the scipy.org site that the preferred citation for NumPy is
the "Guide to NumPy":
https://www.scipy.org/citing.html
This could work for what I'm writing, but I'd prefer to find a citation
specifically for NumPy's ndarray data structure. Does such a citation exist?
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 23:48 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 17:33 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote:
>
> If we do not plan to replace it within numpy, we need to discuss a
> bit
> how it might affect infrastructure (multiple implementations).
>
> There is the other
