Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 4:39 PM Hameer Abbasi wrote: > On Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:21 PM, Stephan Hoyer > wrote: > Are there aspects of your uarray proposal that are relevant to the current > proposed revisions to NEP 18? If so, please restate them :). > > > Of course, here’s my proposal: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:46 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > Worst, "__wrapped__" would be difficult to search for, because it already > means something in Python (referring to functools.wrapped). At least > "__numpy_implementation__" and "__skipping_array_function__" are both unique > tokens

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:44 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:05 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < > m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I agree with Ralf that there are two discussions going on, but also with >> Hameer that they are related, in that part of the very

Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py is not recognizing Absoft Fortran Compiler

On April/27/2019 21:59:37, Charles R Harris wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:40 PM Samuel Dupree > wrote: I'm attempting to build an interface between a Fortran application I have and Python. The problem I'm having is that f2py is not recognizing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py is not recognizing Absoft Fortran Compiler

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:40 PM Samuel Dupree wrote: > > I'm attempting to build an interface between a Fortran application I > have and Python. The problem I'm having is that f2py is not recognizing > my Absoft Fortran compiler. Details follow. > > I'm running on a iMacPro (2017) under Mac OS X

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 4:38 PM Hameer Abbasi wrote: > Of course, here’s my proposal: > > We leave NEP-18 as-is for now, and instead of writing separate protocols > for coercion, dtypes and ufuncs (which will be needed somewhere down the > line), we have a discussion about uarray and see if it

[Numpy-discussion] f2py is not recognizing Absoft Fortran Compiler

I'm attempting to build an interface between a Fortran application I have and Python. The problem I'm having is that f2py is not recognizing my Absoft Fortran compiler. Details follow. I'm running on a iMacPro (2017) under Mac OS X Mojave (ver. 10.14.4). The version of the Absoft Compiler

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

Hi Stephan, > On Saturday, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:21 PM, Stephan Hoyer (mailto:sho...@gmail.com)> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:16 AM Hameer Abbasi (mailto:einstein.edi...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > That said, please save it a separate discussion thread, given that the > > > design of uarray is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

Hi Ralf, [snip] > If I'm missing something that's actually in NEP 18, can you please point out > the actual text? NEP-22 is the high-level overview of the goals, but NEP-18 is the concrete proposal for __array_function__. Quoting that NEP, right under “Implementation": > The

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sebastian Berg at BIDS

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:54 PM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are happy to announce that Sebastian Berg has joined the team at > BIDS, and will be working full-time on NumPy for the next two years. > Sebastian has been a core contributor to the project for seven years >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On 27/4/19 6:51 am, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: Maybe it is best to just stick with __wrapped__ +1 for simplicity, clarity (since __wrapped__ is part of the |documented @functools.wraps() interface)|, and lowering expectations. Matti ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.3.0rc1 -- please test

Thank you Tyler! On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 3:26 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce > the release candidate SciPy 1.3.0rc1. Please help us test this pre-release. > > Sources and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] ANN: SciPy 1.3.0rc1 -- please test

Hi Tyler, I just tested scipy.optimize.cython_optimize using the jupyter notebooks in this gist: https://gist.github.com/mikofski/ac30065073d0d32d6ea3569f6e24e5ec and it seems to be working fine. procedure: 1. download the scipy-1.3.0rc1 asset for my platform (macosx py37)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sebastian Berg at BIDS

Congratulations Sebastian!! On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 8:24 PM David Cournapeau wrote: > That's awesome. Congratulations ! > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:20 AM Stefan van der Walt > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> We are happy to announce that Sebastian Berg has joined the team at >> BIDS, and will

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

Hi All, I agree with Ralf that there are two discussions going on, but also with Hameer that they are related, in that part of the very purpose of __array_function__ was to gain freedom to experiment with implementations. And in particular the freedom to *assume* that inputs are arrays so that we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding to the non-dispatched implementation of NumPy methods

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 7:05 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I agree with Ralf that there are two discussions going on, but also with > Hameer that they are related, in that part of the very purpose of > __array_function__ was to gain freedom to experiment

Re: [Numpy-discussion] how much does binary size matter?

Le vendredi 26 avril 2019, 21:13:22 SAST Julian Taylor a écrit : Hi all, It seems that my message was misinterpreted, so let me clarify a few things. I'm not saying that increasing the size of the binary is a bad thing, specially if there are lots of improvements that caused this increase. My

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.3.0rc1 -- please test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce the release candidate SciPy 1.3.0rc1. Please help us test this pre-release. Sources and binary wheels can be found at:https://pypi.org/project/scipy/ and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sebastian Berg at BIDS

That's awesome. Congratulations ! On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:20 AM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are happy to announce that Sebastian Berg has joined the team at > BIDS, and will be working full-time on NumPy for the next two years. > Sebastian has been a core contributor to

[Numpy-discussion] 2019 John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Contest Reminder

Hi everybody, I'd like to remind you all about the 2019 John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Contest. My apologies to those of you getting this on multiple lists. In memory of John Hunter, we are pleased to be reviving the SciPy John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Competition for 2019. This open

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sebastian Berg at BIDS

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:45 PM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are happy to announce that Sebastian Berg has joined the team at > BIDS, and will be working full-time on NumPy for the next two years. > Sebastian has been a core contributor to the project for seven years >