On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 12:29 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> We seem to have run out of steam a bit here.
>
We discussed this today in person at the NumPy sprint.
The consensus was to go for a name like __skip_array_function__. Ufuncs
don't have very good use-cases for a function that skips dispatch:
TL;DR:
This issue appears to have been fixed in numpy 1.15 (at least, I didn't
test 1.14)
However, I also had some issues in my environment that I also fixed, so it
may be that numpy's behavior hasn't changed -- I don't have the energy to
test now.
And it doesn't hurt to have this in the
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:24 AM Ngoran Clare-Joyce F. <
joycetirn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Ralf,
>
> Thank you for the resources, they were very helpful.
> I am done setting up the environment and I'm looking forward to making
> contributions.
>
Hi Joyce, that's great. Let us know if you
Hi Joe,
Thanks for sharing!
I'm going to use your handout as a base for my numerical computing classes,
(with an appropriate citation, of course :-)).
чт, 9 мая 2019 г., 21:19 Joe Harrington :
> I have a handout for my PHZ 3150 Introduction to Numerical Computing
> course that includes some
Joe,
While most of your style suggestions are reasonable, I would actually
recommend the opposite of the first point you make in (a)., especially
if you're trying to write generic reusable code.
> For example, an item count is always an integer, but a distance is always a
> float.
This is
Hello Ralf,
Thank you for the resources, they were very helpful.
I am done setting up the environment and I'm looking forward to making
contributions.
Thank you,
Joyce.
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:57 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi Ngoran, welcome!
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Joyce Tirnyuy
