Re: [Numpy-discussion] Showing by examples how Python-Numpy can be efficient even for computationally intensive tasks

2020-11-26 Thread Jerome Kieffer
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:14:40 +0100 (CET) PIERRE AUGIER wrote: > I changed the email subject because I'd like to focus less on CO2 (a very > interesting subject, but not my focus here) and more on computing... > Hi Pierre, We may turn the problem in another way around: one should more focus on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Added Rivest-Floyd selection algorithm as an option to numpy.partition

2020-11-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:56 PM Виктория Малясова < malyasova.viktor...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I've implemented the Rivest-Floyd selection algorithm as a second option > to the partition method. I found it works about 1.5 times faster on average > for big array sizes; here are av

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Showing by examples how Python-Numpy can be efficient even for computationally intensive tasks

2020-11-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:15 PM PIERRE AUGIER < pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: > > I conclude from these types of results that we need to tell Python users > how to accelerate their Python-Numpy codes when they feel the need of it. I > think acceleration tools should be mentioned in

[Numpy-discussion] Showing by examples how Python-Numpy can be efficient even for computationally intensive tasks

2020-11-26 Thread PIERRE AUGIER
I changed the email subject because I'd like to focus less on CO2 (a very interesting subject, but not my focus here) and more on computing... - Mail original - > De: "Andy Ray Terrel" > À: "numpy-discussion" > Envoyé: Mardi 24 Novembre 2020 18:27:52 > Objet: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Comm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add sliding_window_view method to numpy

2020-11-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 4:03 PM Zimmermann Klaus wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/11/2020 15:58, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:51 AM Zimmermann Klaus > > mailto:klaus.zimmerm...@smhi.se>> wrote: > > I have absolutely no problem keeping this out of the main namespace. > > > > In fa