On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 12:10 PM Sebastian Berg
wrote:
>
> This type of change should be in the release notes undoubtedly and
> likely a `.. versionchanged::` directive in the docstring.
>
> Maybe the best thing would be to create a single, prominent but brief,
> changelog listing all (or almost
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 2:32 AM wrote:
> I tried to implement a different implementation of the ziggurat method for
> generating standard normal distributions that is about twice as fast and
> uses 2/3 of the memory than the old one.
> I tested the implementation separately and am very confident
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 16:36 +, Kevin Sheppard wrote:
> That is good news indeed. Seems like a good upgrade, especially
> given the breadth of application of normals and the multiple
> appearances within distributions.c (e.g., Cauchy). Is there a
> deprecation for a change like this? Or is it
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:38 AM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
> That is good news indeed. Seems like a good upgrade, especially given the
> breadth of application of normals and the multiple appearances within
> distributions.c (e.g., Cauchy). Is there a deprecation for a change like
> this? Or is it
That is good news indeed. Seems like a good upgrade, especially given the breadth of application of normals and the multiple appearances within distributions.c (e.g., Cauchy). Is there a deprecation for a change like this? Or is it just a note and new random numbers in the next major? I think
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:53 AM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
> My reading is that the first 4 are pure C, presumably using the standard
> practice of inclining so as to make the tightest loop possible, and to
> allow the compiler to make other optimizations. The final line is what
> happens when you
My reading is that the first 4 are pure C, presumably using the standard practice of inclining so as to make the tightest loop possible, and to allow the compiler to make other optimizations. The final line is what happens when you replace the existing ziggurat in NumPy with the new one. I read
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:05 AM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
> If I understand correctly, there is no gain when applying this patch to
> Generator. I'm not that surprised that this is the case since the compiler
> is much more limited in when it can do in Generator than what it can when
> filling a
This is very comforting news :) Welcome back
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 9:10 PM Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, at 10:12, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> Pearu Peterson has joined the NumPy developers team. Pearu was responsible
> for contributing f2py and much of distutils in the
If I understand correctly, there is no gain when applying this patch to
Generator. I'm not that surprised that this is the case since the compiler
is much more limited in when it can do in Generator than what it can when
filling a large array directly with functions available for inlining and
10 matches
Mail list logo
