Hi,
a while ago I tried to figure out what holds back the PR 11197. Could
anyone have a look? Thanks for your help.
Andreas
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi,
as previously discussed on the mailing list
http://numpy-discussion.10968.n7.nabble.com/Inconsistent-results-for-the-covariance-matrix-between-scipy-optimize-curve-fit-and-numpy-polyfit-td45582.html
and listed in the issude https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/11196
there is no-standard
Hi,
in [1] the scaling factor for the covariance matrix of `np.polyfit` was
discussed. The conclusion was, that it is non-standard and a patch might be
in order to correct this. Pull request [2] changes the factor from
chisq(popt)/(M-N-2) to chisq(popt)/(M-N) (with M=number of point, N=number
of