Re: [Numpy-discussion] Helping with website improvements

2019-07-18 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:45 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > That sounds good to me. I believe SymPy is also pretty happy with their > interactive terminal embedded in their website. > > Could you create a new issue on https://github.com/numpy/numpy.org/issues? > It would be good to start keeping

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.org website redesign proposal

2019-07-17 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:00 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > I just opened https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14032, which contains a > NEP for a redesign of the NumPy website (just the top-level site, not the > docs). The part that most warrants discussion is probably the translation >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Helping with website improvements

2019-07-17 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:11 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> Has anybody tried Katacoda before: >> https://www.katacoda.com/courses/python/playground ? >> > > I haven't heard of it before. Looks cool. Seems to run on Docker, so would > require some infrastructure. If it's something we could get from

[Numpy-discussion] Helping with website improvements

2019-07-15 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
. Reporting bugs on GitHub is better of course, but this may be a bit easier for the users. Since these are not incremental changes, if may be better if I work on a fork of the website repository, until they are finished and the new website is ready. Regards, Dashamir Hoxha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] defining a NumPy API standard?

2019-06-02 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > >>> Would it be useful if we could integrate the documentation system with a >>> discussion forum (like Discourse.org)? Each function can be linked to its >>> own discussion topic, where users and developers can discuss about the >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] defining a NumPy API standard?

2019-06-02 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 10:01 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Thanks! I know this is going to be a little complicated to get everyone on > the same page. That's why I'm aiming to get a draft out before SciPy'19 so > there's a chance to discuss it in person with everyone who is there. > Mailing lists

Re: [Numpy-discussion] defining a NumPy API standard?

2019-06-01 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 10:05 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > I think this is potentially useful, but *far* more prescriptive and > detailed than I had in mind. Both you and Nathaniel seem to have not > understood what I mean by "out of scope", so I think that's my fault in not > being explicit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoD - Technical Writter

2019-05-17 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:54 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi Dashamir, > > Thank you for your email and interest in NumPy and SciPy. I'm excited > about this program and opportunity to work with a technical writer. Please > rest assured that we do not assume or expect you to be familiar with the >