Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: split numpy.distutils into it's own package

la, 2020-10-24 kello 03:11 -0400, Dustin Spicuzza kirjoitti: > Cross-compiling scipy and other projects that depend on numpy's > distutils is a huge pain right now, because to do it [in addition to > lots of other details that you have to get right] you have to have > both > a native and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using a pyproject.toml file

su, 2019-07-14 kello 09:46 -0500, Matti Picus kirjoitti: [clip] > Questions: > - Is the pain of adding a pyproject.toml worth it for using towncrier > or should we o for another release-note solution > - Is the addition of pyproject.toml problematic enough that I should > break it out into a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

ti, 2018-08-21 kello 01:02 +0200, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: [clip] > Not volunteering to take this into completion, though. Well, turns out otherwise: https://planetscipy.netlify.com/ https://github.com/pv/staticplanet/ It's just a essentially stateless static site generator that can be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The http://planet.scipy.org/ site is down.

ma, 2018-08-20 kello 10:18 -0700, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] > Number 1 on my wish list for an alternative is something that's > either > hosted or serverless; we always have problems with any server that > needs > maintaining. Right now there's on healthy server for >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

fo.python-as-glue.rst It also does no mention CFFI either, mostly because the original text predates the project. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python 3 compatible examples

pe, 2018-06-01 kello 14:17 -0600, Charles R Harris kirjoitti: > This post is prompted by this PR /11222>. > It would be good to come up with a timeline and plan for rewriting > the > examples to be Python 3 compatible. When we do so, we should also > make it

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.1.0 released

ic Stansifer + * Martin Thoma * Phil Tooley + * Piotr Uchwat + * Paul van Mulbregt * Pauli Virtanen * Stefan van der Walt * Warren Weckesser * Florian Weimer + * Eric Wieser * Josh Wilson * Ted Ying + * Evgeny Zhurko * Zé Vinícius * @Astrofysicus + * @awakenting + * @endolith * @FormerPhysicist + * @gaulinmp

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 3D array slicing bug?

ke, 2018-03-21 kello 20:40 +, Michael Himes kirjoitti: > I have discovered what I believe is a bug with array slicing > involving 3D (and higher) dimension arrays. When slicing a 3D array > by a single value for axis 0, all values for axis 1, and a list to > slice axis 2, the dimensionality of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 3D array slicing bug?

erence/arrays.indexing.html#combining-advanced-and-basic-indexing The key part seems to be: "There are two parts to the indexing operation, the subspace defined by the basic indexing (**excluding integers**) and the subspace from the advanced ind

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Directives in numpy docstring convention

su, 2017-12-24 kello 18:51 +, Marc Garcia kirjoitti: [clip] > I guess those directives were added to the sphinx after the numpy > docstring convention was created. Just a comment on the historical point: the Numpy docstring standard existed before first Sphinx release. -- Pauli Vi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] power function distribution or power-law distribution?

scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.random.power .html > BTW. how is this list related to numpy-discuss...@scipy.org? That's the old address of this list. The current address is numpy-discussion@python.org and it should be used instead. -- Pauli Virtanen ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 12.07.2017 klo 13:53: > In practice, that would generally be true, but the nose testing tools > were 1, all nose imports were buried in functions that ran during > testing. Whether or not that was by intent I don't know. But having an > explicit consensus on 2, which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

Charles R Harris kirjoitti 29.06.2017 klo 20:45: > Here's a random idea: how about building a NumPy gallery? > scikit-{image,learn} has it, and while those projects may have more > visual datasets, I can imagine something along the lines of Nicolas > Rougier's beautiful book: > >