Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence

On 16/11/19 1:42 pm, Matti Picus wrote: I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-Octo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] "Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence

I also support this. Small price in edge case usability for a lot less shooting yourself in the foot On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:29 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake > often when teaching NumPy. > > > On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] "Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence

For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake often when teaching NumPy. > On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 am, Matti Picus wrote: > > I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" > to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually ther

[Numpy-discussion] "Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence

I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html. PR 14794 https://gith