On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:57 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:45 AM Marten van Kerkwijk <
> m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does the above make sense? I realize that the same would be true for
>> `__array_ufunc__`, though there the situation is slightly trickier since it
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:45 AM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the above make sense? I realize that the same would be true for
> `__array_ufunc__`, though there the situation is slightly trickier since it
> is not as easy to bypass any further override checks.
Hi again,
Another thought about __array_function__, this time about the
implementation for ndarray. In it, we currently check whether any of the
types define a (different) __array_function__, and, if so, give up. This
seems too strict: I think that, at least in principle, subclasses should be
