On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 9:34 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:08 AM Pearu Peterson
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> See GH discussion starting at
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/18454#discussion_r579967791 for the
>> raised issue that is now moved here.
>>
>> Re "Compensating
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:08 AM Pearu Peterson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See GH discussion starting at
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/18454#discussion_r579967791 for the
> raised issue that is now moved here.
>
> Re "Compensating fairly" section:
>
> The NEP proposes location-dependent contracts
Yes.
On 2/22/2021 7:08 AM, Pearu Peterson wrote:
it is nobody's business, IMHO, and is likely very hard if not impossible to
verify
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
Hi,
See GH discussion starting at
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/18454#discussion_r579967791 for the
raised issue that is now moved here.
Re "Compensating fairly" section:
The NEP proposes location-dependent contracts for fair pays.
I think this is a contradictory approach as location is
Hi all,
Here is a NEP with guidelines around spending NumPy project funds for your
consideration/review, drafted by Inessa, Stéfan and myself. Please keep
discussion of the main ideas on this thread, and detailed/textual comments
on https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/18454.
We did quite a bit
