On 9/29/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
>> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
>> mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner loop. And pushing this parti
On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 00:20 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> > Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is
> > there no
> > mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner
On 9/29/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
>> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
>> mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner loop. And pushing this parti
On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
> mechanism to do that today?
Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
detected in an inner loop. And pushing this particular error
detection into the inner loop does
Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
mechanism to do that today?
I don't think you were proposing that core dimensions should _never_ be
allowed to be 0, but if you were I disagree. I spent a fair amount of work
enabling that for linalg because it provided some
