On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> This discussion has died down, but I don't want to lose momentum .
>
> It sounds like there is at least strong interest from a subset of our
> community in type annotations. Are there any objections to the first part of
>
This discussion has died down, but I don't want to lose momentum .
It sounds like there is at least strong interest from a subset of our
community in type annotations. Are there any objections to the first part
of my plan, to start developing type stubs for NumPy in separate repository?
We'll
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman
> > wrote:
> >> Assuming that sounds good, my tentative next steps
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> > This discussion has died down, but I don't want to lose momentum .
> >
> > It sounds like there is at least strong interest from a subset of our
>
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> - NEPs are really part of the development process, not an output for
> end-users -- they're certainly useful to have available as a
> reference, but if we're asking end-users to look at them on a regular
> basis then I
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we expect to be writing some NEPs in the near future, Nathaniel
> and I were looking at how they're organized, and realized that the
> process is a bit underspecified and it's a hard to tell the
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman
> wrote:
>> Assuming that sounds good, my tentative next steps are:
>>
>> - I'll draft a purpose and process NEP based on PEP 1 and a few other
>>
On 5 December 2017 at 17:32, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jarrod Millman
I was planning on looking at/working on the main doc generating system
and the main webpage (for numpy and scipy) soon (over the winter
break), but I didn't want to get too many things in the discussion
right now. My immediate interest is getting agreement on the first
two items:
- A purpose and
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> - NEPs are really part of the development process, not
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> - NEPs are really part of the development process, not an output for
>> end-users -- they're certainly useful to have available as a
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo