On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:12 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
Upgrading numpy with pip on Python 3.8b4 on Win 10
produced:
ERROR: Could not install packages due to an
EnvironmentError: [WinError 123] The filename,
directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect:
'"C:'
H
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 9:45 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:12 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> >> Upgrading numpy with pip on Python 3.8b4 on Win 10
> >> produced:
> >> ERROR: Could not install packages due to an
> >> EnvironmentError: [WinError 123] The filename,
>
On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> NumPy devs,
>
> NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
> (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html) has
> been accepted.
CI gurus: the web page containing the rendered NEPs,
https://numpy.org/neps/, has not updated since the pull req
On 9/28/2019 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I'm actually pleased that the install succeeded on Window, although you won't have good BLAS/LAPACK, just the numpy C versions of lapack_lite. The warning/error is a bit
concerning though, it would be nice to know if it is from Python3.8 pip or numpy
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:23 AM Alan Isaac wrote:
> On 9/28/2019 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> > I'm actually pleased that the install succeeded on Window, although you
> won't have good BLAS/LAPACK, just the numpy C versions of lapack_lite. The
> warning/error is a bit
> > concerning thou
I'm experimenting with gufuncs, and I just created a simple one with
signature '(i)->()'. Is there a way to configure the gufunc itself so
that an empty array results in an error? Or would I have to create a
Python wrapper around the gufunc that does the error checking?
Currently, when passed an
Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
mechanism to do that today?
I don't think you were proposing that core dimensions should _never_ be
allowed to be 0, but if you were I disagree. I spent a fair amount of work
enabling that for linalg because it provided some
On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 13:15 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> > NumPy devs,
> >
> > NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
> > (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html)
> > has
> > been accepted.
>
> CI gurus: the web page containing
On 9/28/19, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 13:15 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
>> On 9/27/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
>> > NumPy devs,
>> >
>> > NEP 32 to remove the financial functions
>> > (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0032-remove-financial-functions.html)
>> > has
>> > been accep
On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
> mechanism to do that today?
Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
detected in an inner loop. And pushing this particular error
detection into the inner loop does
On 9/29/19, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
>> Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is there no
>> mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner loop. And pushing this parti
On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 00:20 -0400, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> On 9/28/19, Eric Wieser wrote:
> > Can you just raise an exception in the gufuncs inner loop? Or is
> > there no
> > mechanism to do that today?
>
> Maybe? I don't know what is the idiomatic way to handle errors
> detected in an inner
12 matches
Mail list logo