On July 27, 2018 17:04:23 Marten van Kerkwijk
wrote:
My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the
golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text.
Agreed! There's some basic ground that needs to be covered, though, and the
result of exploring
I would be happy to adopt the SciPy code of conduct and code of conduct
committee both.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the
> golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the
> golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. I
> particularly appreciate the lack of absolutism in the text
My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the
golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. I
particularly appreciate the lack of absolutism in the text, and the
acknowledgement that it is possible to have a bad day even while not
distracting from
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Stefan van der Walt
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A while ago, SciPy (the library) adopted its Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/conduct/code_
> of_conduct.html
>
> We worked hard to make that document friendly, while at the same time
Hi everyone,
A while ago, SciPy (the library) adopted its Code of Conduct:
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.html
We worked hard to make that document friendly, while at the same time
stating clearly the kinds of behavior that would and would not be
tolerated.
Two largish pull requests that implement approved NEPS are waiting for
review:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11175 for expanded gufunc signatures
(NEP 20)
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/10915 for merging multiarray and
umath c-extension modules (NEP 15)
I realize reviewer time i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:38 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> This is very developer-centric view. We have lots of users and also lots
> of no-longer-active contributors. The needs, interests and previous work
> put into NumPy of those groups of people matter.
>
Yes, I suppose it is :).
I tend to view
