Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Stefan van der Walt
On July 27, 2018 17:04:23 Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. Agreed! There's some basic ground that needs to be covered, though, and the result of exploring

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Stephan Hoyer
I would be happy to adopt the SciPy code of conduct and code of conduct committee both. On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the > golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the > golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. I > particularly appreciate the lack of absolutism in the text

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. I particularly appreciate the lack of absolutism in the text, and the acknowledgement that it is possible to have a bad day even while not distracting from

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A while ago, SciPy (the library) adopted its Code of Conduct: > https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/conduct/code_ > of_conduct.html > > We worked hard to make that document friendly, while at the same time

[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi everyone, A while ago, SciPy (the library) adopted its Code of Conduct: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.html We worked hard to make that document friendly, while at the same time stating clearly the kinds of behavior that would and would not be tolerated.

[Numpy-discussion] NEP 15, 20 implementations waiting for review

2018-07-27 Thread Matti Picus
Two largish pull requests that implement approved NEPS are waiting for review: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11175 for expanded gufunc signatures (NEP 20) https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/10915 for merging multiarray and umath c-extension modules (NEP 15) I realize reviewer time i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] backwards compatibility and deprecation policy NEP

2018-07-27 Thread Stephan Hoyer
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:38 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > This is very developer-centric view. We have lots of users and also lots > of no-longer-active contributors. The needs, interests and previous work > put into NumPy of those groups of people matter. > Yes, I suppose it is :). I tend to view