Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

On 15/08/18 19:44, Matthew Brett wrote: My suspicion is, to the extent that Matti and Tyler can devote time and energy to shepherding the discussion, these will become quicker and more productive. Since my name was mentioned .. Even if we could implement pull

[Numpy-discussion] mplcursors 0.2 release

Dear all, I am please to announce the release of mplcursors 0.2. # Description mplcursors provides interactive data selection cursors for Matplotlib. Features include a callback system allowing full customization of the actions when data selection is triggered, and the ability to add a data

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 21:30 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey < > > p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

On August 15, 2018 06:31:08 Ralf Gommers wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged. It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

Hi Hans, Pauli, If `pybind11` is included, it could be interesting to also include `xtensor` and `xtensor-python`. - Xtensor is a C++ dynamic N-d array library that offers numpy-like features including broadcasting and universal functions. It is also lazy evaluated and continuously benchmarked

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

Nathaniel, Thanks for raising these thoughtful concerns. Your independent review of this proposal is greatly appreciated! See my responses inline below: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:44 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote: > The other approach would be to incrementally add clean, well-defined > dunder

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

Hi, On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Hameer Abbasi wrote: > On 15. Aug 2018, at 18:25, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks Nathaniel for this thoughtful response. > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > ... > > The other approach would be to incrementally add clean,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Nathaniel for this thoughtful response. > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > ... > > The other approach would be to incrementally add clean, well-defined > > dunder methods like __array_ufunc__,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey < >> p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

Hi, ke, 2018-08-15 kello 11:40 +0200, Hans Dembinski kirjoitti: [clip: pybind11] > So far all these reasons and more, it should be mentioned and even > highlighted here: > > https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/c-info.python-as-glue.html < >

[Numpy-discussion] Add pybind11 to docs about writing binding code

Dear all, I just joined the numpy mailing list to suggest an enhancement of the docs about writing binding code https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/c-info.python-as-glue.html I hope this is the right place to discuss this.