Re: [Numpy-discussion] Replacement for Rackspace

On 8/11/20 12:39 AM, Peter Cock wrote: Hi Matti, Is this an open invitation to the wider Numpy ecosystem? I am interested on behalf of Biopython which was using the donated Rackspace for multibuild

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Experimental `like=` attribute for array creation functions

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:37 PM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 17:35 +0200, Hameer Abbasi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We should have a higher-bandwidth meeting/communication for all > > stakeholders, and particularly some library authors, to see what > > would be good for them. > I'm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Replacement for Rackspace

Hi Matti, Is this an open invitation to the wider Numpy ecosystem? I am interested on behalf of Biopython which was using the donated Rackspace for multibuild wheel staging prior to PyPy release (although having weekly test releases sounds interesting too). I would be happy to continue this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Replacement for Rackspace

On 8/10/20 10:54 PM, Peter Wang wrote: FWIW, we're happy to provide wheel hosting for statsmodels on anaconda.org . -Peter On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:01 AM Kevin Sheppard mailto:kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com>> wrote: The Rackspace hosted wheel endpoints at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Replacement for Rackspace

FWIW, we're happy to provide wheel hosting for statsmodels on anaconda.org. -Peter On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:01 AM Kevin Sheppard wrote: > The Rackspace hosted wheel endpoints at > > > > > https://7933911d6844c6c53a7d-47bd50c35cd79bd838daf386af554a83.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/ > > > > and > > > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Experimental `like=` attribute for array creation functions

On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 17:35 +0200, Hameer Abbasi wrote: > Hi, > > We should have a higher-bandwidth meeting/communication for all > stakeholders, and particularly some library authors, to see what > would be good for them. > > We should definitely have language in the NEP that says it won’t be >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Experimental `like=` attribute for array creation functions

Hi, We should have a higher-bandwidth meeting/communication for all stakeholders, and particularly some library authors, to see what would be good for them. We should definitely have language in the NEP that says it won’t be in a release unless the NEP is accepted. Best regards, Hameer Abbasi

[Numpy-discussion] Experimental `like=` attribute for array creation functions

Hi all, as a heads up that Peter Entschev has a PR open to add `like=` to most array creation functions, my current plan is to merge it soon as a preliminary API and bring it up again before the actual release (in a few months). This allows overriding for array-likes, e.g. it will allow:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Type declaration to include all valid numerical NumPy types for Cython

Yes it seems like I don't have any other option anyways. There is a bit of a penalty but I guess this should do the trick. Thanks Eric (again! :D) On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:51 AM Eric Moore wrote: > If that is really all you need, then the version in python is: > > def convert_one(a): >