Re: [Numpy-discussion] Syntax Improvement for Array Transpose

Only concerns #4 from Ilhan's list. ср, 26 июн. 2019 г. в 00:01, Ralf Gommers : > > [] > > Perhaps not full consensus between the many people with different opinions > and interests. But for the first one, arr.T change: it's clear that this > won't happen. > To begin with, I must admit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Type annotations for NumPy

Hi! 2017-11-26 4:31 GMT+03:00 Juan Nunez-Iglesias : > > On 26 Nov 2017, 12:27 PM +1100, Nathaniel Smith , wrote: > > It turns out that the PEP 484 type system is *mostly* not useful for > this. They're really designed for checking consistency across a large >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorting of an array row-by-row?

h is 1D. 1D arrays do not have an axis=1. You actually > want to iterate over the columns, so np.lexsort(a.T) is the correct > phrasing of that. No idea about the speed difference. > >-Joe > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Kirill Balunov <kirillbalu...@gmail.com> >

[Numpy-discussion] Sorting of an array row-by-row?

Hi, I was trying to sort an array (N, 3) by rows, and firstly come with this solution: N = 100 arr = np.random.randint(-100, 100, size=(N, 3)) dt = np.dtype([('x', int),('y', int),('z', int)]) *arr.view(dtype=dt).sort(axis=0)* Then I found another way using lexsort function *:* *idx =