On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM PIERRE AUGIER <
pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:49:08 -0500
> > From: Ralf Gommers
> > To: Discussion of Numerical Python
> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Transonic Vision
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:49:08 -0500
> From: Ralf Gommers
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Transonic Vision: unifying
> Python-Numpy accelerators
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
&
y.cc/transonic-vision
> :-)
>
> Pierre
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:16:06 +0100 (CET)
> > From: PIERRE AUGIER
> > To: numpy-discussion@python.org
> > Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Transonic Vision: unifying Python-Numpy
> >
of these functions with pure Numpy, Numba
and Pythran ?
You can find out the answer in our note http://tiny.cc/transonic-vision :-)
Pierre
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:16:06 +0100 (CET)
> From: PIERRE AUGIER
> To: numpy-discussion@python.org
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] T
Dear Python-Numpy community,
Few years ago I started to use a lot Python and Numpy for science. I'd like to
thanks all people who contribute to this fantastic community.
I used a lot Cython, Pythran and Numba and for the FluidDyn project, we created
Transonic, a pure Python package to easily
