Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-14 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Indeed, we do something similar in astropy, with a pre-release failure being considered breakage (rather than ignorable as for -dev): https://github.com/astropy/astropy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L142 ​-- Marten ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi Nathan, One very helpful think you could do, is add a Travis-CI matrix entry where you are testing against the latest numpy nightly builds. I got a bit lost in your tox setup, but the basic idea is that, for one test entry, you add the following flags to pip: -f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14 > release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One > example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Request for a -rc seconded (although this time we should be fine for astropy, as things are working well with -dev). -- Marten ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Nathan Goldbaum
Hi Chuck, Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14 release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py release didn’t come out with a workaround or fix for a couple months.

[Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, There is a PR for the updated NumPy 1.15.0 release notes . I would appreciate it if all those involved in the thatn release would have a look and fix incorrect or missing notes. Cheers, Chuck ___