Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extended Outer Product

2007-09-20 Thread Anne Archibald
On 19/09/2007, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne Archibald wrote: vectorize, of course, is a good example of my point above: it really just loops, in python IIRC, but conceptually it's extremely handy for doing exactly what the OP wanted. Unfortunately vectorize() does not

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: PyTables and PyTables Pro 2.0.1 available

2007-09-20 Thread Francesc Altet
Announcing PyTables and PyTables Pro 2.0.1 PyTables is a library for managing hierarchical datasets and designed to efficiently cope with extremely large amounts of data with support for full 64-bit file

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bitting the bullet: using scons to build extensions inside distutils ?

2007-09-20 Thread David Cournapeau
On 9/20/07, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Cournapeau wrote: Hi, Starting thinking over the whole distutils thing, I was thinking what people would think about using scons inside distutils to build extension. The more I think about it, the more I think than

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Anyone have a well-tested SWIG-based C++ STL valarray = numpy.array typemap to share?

2007-09-20 Thread Alexander Schmolck
Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The automatic handling of pointers for the default allocation type is also convenient and makes it reasonable to have functions return matrices and vectors. Hmm, I wonder whether I missed something when I read the manual. I didn't see anything in the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Anyone have a well-tested SWIG-based C++ STL valarray = numpy.array typemap to share?

2007-09-20 Thread David Cournapeau
Alexander Schmolck wrote: Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The automatic handling of pointers for the default allocation type is also convenient and makes it reasonable to have functions return matrices and vectors. Hmm, I wonder whether I missed something when I read

[Numpy-discussion] Crash on import numpy [including fix]

2007-09-20 Thread Thomas Schreiner
Hi, I just posted a mail via gmane - I didn't expect it to hit the list, so here's the full context: Using NumPy in an embedded scenario sometimes leads to crashes (floating point exception) depending on the compiler used. If you compile your C++ application with some non-g++ compilers (e.g.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Floating point exception with numpy and embedded python interpreter

2007-09-20 Thread Thomas Schreiner
Arkaitz Bitorika arkaitz.bitorika at gmail.com writes: I've verified that the function causes the exception when embedded in the program but not when used from a simple C program with just a main () function. The successful version iterates 31 times over the for loop while the crashing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compilation failure on python2.4 win32

2007-09-20 Thread Jörgen Stenarson
Travis E. Oliphant skrev: Jörgen Stenarson wrote: Hi, I cannot compile numpy (rev 2042) for python2.4 on win32, it works on python2.5. It looks like the call to function get_build_architecture in distutils.misc_util.py is python2.5 specific. Yes. This needs to be fixed. I'll do it.

[Numpy-discussion] [Fwd: Re: numpy revision 2680 causes segfault on Solaris]

2007-09-20 Thread Christopher Hanley
Hi Travis, The test failure was caused by a new test being added to the test suite to catch an existing problem. It was not a new code change that caused the problem. Chris -- Christopher Hanley Systems Software Engineer Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore MD,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Fwd: Re: numpy revision 2680 causes segfault on Solaris]

2007-09-20 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Chris Does this problem persist? I thought Eric's patch fixed it. Goes to show, we really need a Big Endian buildbot client. Cheers Stéfan On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:56:46PM -0400, Christopher Hanley wrote: Hi Travis, The test failure was caused by a new test being added to the test

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Fwd: Re: numpy revision 2680 causes segfault on Solaris]

2007-09-20 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi Chris On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:30:18PM -0400, Christopher Hanley wrote: We have not seen any test failures on our big-endian Solaris system. Did you re-implement the unit test that was failing. I was under the impression that the fix had been to comment out the test the was failing.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Fwd: Re: numpy revision 2680 causes segfault on Solaris]

2007-09-20 Thread Christopher Hanley
Cool! Thank you Stefan and mostly Eric. Cheers, Chris ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion