Hi all,
Please review
http://codereview.appspot.com/2485
which adds `numpy.doc` as a way of documenting topics such as indexing
and broadcasting.
The corresponding trac ticket is
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/846
Regards
Stéfan
___
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
Could I ask that both this patch and my earlier one (ticket #843) be
applied to subversion. Thank you.
Definitely not enjoying this low level code.
commit 80e1aca1725dd4cd8e091126cf515c39ac3a33ff
Hi numpy-devs, I was the one reporting the original bug about missing ATLAS
support in the debian lenny python-numpy package. AFAICT the source
python-numpy package in etch (numpy version 1.0.1) does not require
atlas to build
_dotblas.c, only lapack is needed. If you install the resulting binary
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Michael Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
Could I ask that both this patch and my earlier one (ticket #843) be
applied to subversion. Thank you.
I'll take a look at
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi numpy-devs, I was the one reporting the original bug about missing ATLAS
support in the debian lenny python-numpy package. AFAICT the source
python-numpy package in etch (numpy version 1.0.1) does not require
atlas to
Dnia poniedziałek 07 lipiec 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
File /home/marek/tmp/numpy-1.1.0/numpy/distutils/ccompiler.py,
line 303, in CCompiler_cxx_compiler
+ cxx.linker_so[2:]
TypeError: can only concatenate list (not str) to list
Just by reading at the code, the
I think we should try to get a quick bug fix version out by the end of the
month. What do others think?
Chuck
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
2008/7/8 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think we should try to get a quick bug fix version out by the end of the
month. What do others think?
That was the plan. We wanted a release before the conference -- early
enough so that Enthought could push out an EPD release. We'd also
like to
2008/7/8 Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/7/8 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think we should try to get a quick bug fix version out by the end of the
month. What do others think?
That was the plan. We wanted a release before the conference -- early
enough so that Enthought
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/7/8 Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think we should try to get a quick bug fix version out by the end of
the
month. What do others think?
That was the plan. We wanted a release before the conference
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the schedule? I have 4 bugs to fix and will get to them this
weekend. Should we put together a bug action list?
Thanks for getting this conversation going. I have been meaning to
send an email for some time
Michael Abbott wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
The first part of this patch is good. The second is not needed. Also,
it would be useful if you could write a test case that shows what is
leaking and how you determined
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Since chararray doesn't currently have any tests, I'm writing some,
and I ran across a couple of things that didn't make sense to me:
1. The code for __mul__ is exactly the same as that for __rmul__; is
there any reason __rmul__ shouldn't just call __mul__?
Just
Hi Travis,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael Abbott wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
The first part of this patch is good. The second is not needed. Also,
it would be
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Travis E. Oliphant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
Since chararray doesn't currently have any tests, I'm writing some,
and I ran across a couple of things that didn't make sense to me:
1. The code for __mul__ is exactly the same as that for
I don't know what to write for a doc string for alterdot and
restoredot. Any ideas?
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi,
I want to compile numpy so that it use the optimized fftw librairy. In
the site.cfg.example their is a section [fftw3] that I fill with:
[fftw3]
include_dirs = /usr/include
library_dirs = /usr/lib64
fftw3_libs = fftw3, fftw3f
fftw3_opt_libs = fftw3_threads, fftw3f_threads
when I
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi numpy-devs, I was the one reporting the original bug about missing ATLAS
support in the debian lenny python-numpy package. AFAICT the source
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:14, Frédéric Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to compile numpy so that it use the optimized fftw librairy.
numpy itself does not support this. scipy does.
In
the site.cfg.example their is a section [fftw3] that I fill with:
[fftw3]
include_dirs =
2008/7/8 Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Travis E. Oliphant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan McIntyre wrote:
2. The behavior of __mul__ seems odd:
What is odd about this?
It is patterned after
'a' * 3
'a' * 4
'a' * 5
for regular python strings.
thanks for the information. What made my thought it was possible is
that in the file site.cfg.example their is:
# Given only this section, numpy.distutils will try to figure out which version
# of FFTW you are using.
#[fftw]
#libraries = fftw3
Is this fftw section still usefull?
Frédéric
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:33, Frédéric Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the information. What made my thought it was possible is
that in the file site.cfg.example their is:
# Given only this section, numpy.distutils will try to figure out which
version
# of FFTW you are using.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi numpy-devs, I was the one reporting the original bug about missing ATLAS
support
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:47, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Tiziano Zito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi numpy-devs, I
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:47, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:06, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 16:23, Michael Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Michael Abbott wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
The first part of this patch is good. The second is not
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Michael Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Michael Abbott wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
The first part of this patch is good. The second is
Michael Abbott wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Michael Abbott wrote:
The attached patch fixes another reference count leak in the use of
PyArray_DescrFromType.
The first part of this patch is good. The second is not needed.
I don't see
Hi,
I haven't checked out a recent numpy (( N.__version__
'1.0.3.1'))
But could someone please check if the division has been changed from
'/' to '//' in these places:
C:\Priithon_25_win\numpy\core\numerictypes.py:142: DeprecationWarning:
classic int division
bytes = bits / 8
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 14:01, Keith Goodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what to write for a doc string for alterdot and
restoredot.
Then maybe you're the best one to figure it out. What details do you
think are missing from the current docstrings? What questions do they
leave you
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Chris Bartels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David (and others)
This issue is known:
http://www.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/811
I think this is an issue for the numpy developers. (I don't know how to fix
this easily, i can try to install an older version of
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular, the returned type is always string of length four,
which is very peculiar - why four? I realize that variable-length
strings are a problem (object arrays, I guess?), as is returning
arrays of varying dtypes
32 matches
Mail list logo
