Thank you pauli for your input. I agree with you that our projects
have different goals, even if they touch on the same subject.
The goal of pyhdf5io is to provide a very simple interface, so that
the user can save his/her data. The reasone for picking hdf5 was of
course also to enable the use of
2009/5/23 Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
In [9]: fromfile(empty.dat, count=10)
10 items requested but only 0 read
---
MemoryError Traceback (most recent call last)
On 23-May-09, at 5:36 AM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
So i guess in the long term i have to also add pickling support. In
the short term i will add warnings for the data types that are not
supported.
In order to ensure optimal division of labour, I'd suggest simply
basing your pickling
Can someone with the requisite permissions change the title of ticket
#1113 to reflect the fact that it affects both ppc and ppc64?
Alternately, if you know why the bug is happening, you could file a
patch ;)
David
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
David Warde-Farley wrote:
Can someone with the requisite permissions change the title of ticket
#1113 to reflect the fact that it affects both ppc and ppc64?
Done.
Alternately, if you know why the bug is happening, you could file a
patch ;)
I have not looked at the code, but if
On 23-May-09, at 8:54 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
I have not looked at the code, but if the precision is indeed single
precision, a tolerance of 1e-15 may not make much sense (single
precision has 7 significant digits in normal representation)
Yes, I was wondering about that too, though
I have a question about the numpy.choose method.
I'm working with rgb image arrays (converted using PIL's 'asarray'),
and would like to combine data from multiple images. The choose method
seemed just the thing for what i want to do: creating new images from
multiple source images and an index
Sat, 23 May 2009 09:28:08 -0400, David Warde-Farley wrote:
On 23-May-09, at 8:54 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
I have not looked at the code, but if the precision is indeed single
precision, a tolerance of 1e-15 may not make much sense (single
precision has 7 significant digits in normal
On 23-May-09, at 2:33 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Yes, I was wondering about that too, though notably the tests pass on
x86, and in fact the result on ppc was nowhere near 0 when I
checked it.
What do you mean by nowhere near? What does the following output for
you:
Mark Wendell wrote:
I'm working with rgb image arrays (converted using PIL's 'asarray'),
and would like to combine data from multiple images. The choose method
seemed just the thing for what i want to do: creating new images from
multiple source images and an index mask. However, it looks like
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2009/5/23 Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
In [9]: fromfile(empty.dat, count=10)
Instead of throwing errors in these scenarios, we could just return
the elements read and raise a warning? This is consistent with most
other file APIs I know and allows
Actually my vision with pyhdf5io is to have hdf5 to replace numpy's
own binary file format (.npy, npz). Pyhdf5io (or an incarnation of it)
should be the standard (binary) way to store data in scipy/numpy. A
bold statement, I know, but I think that it would be an improvement,
especially for those
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2009/5/23 Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
In [9]: fromfile(empty.dat, count=10)
Instead of throwing errors in these scenarios, we could just return
the elements read
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Albert Thuswaldner
albert.thuswald...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually my vision with pyhdf5io is to have hdf5 to replace numpy's
own binary file format (.npy, npz). Pyhdf5io (or an incarnation of it)
should be the standard (binary) way to store data in scipy/numpy.
On 23-May-09, at 4:25 PM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Actually my vision with pyhdf5io is to have hdf5 to replace numpy's
own binary file format (.npy, npz). Pyhdf5io (or an incarnation of it)
should be the standard (binary) way to store data in scipy/numpy. A
bold statement, I know, but I
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 06:47, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
On 23-May-09, at 5:36 AM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
So i guess in the long term i have to also add pickling support. In
the short term i will add warnings for the data types that are not
supported.
In order to
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 15:41, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
On 23-May-09, at 4:25 PM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Actually my vision with pyhdf5io is to have hdf5 to replace numpy's
own binary file format (.npy, npz). Pyhdf5io (or an incarnation of it)
should be the standard
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:14, Mark Wendell mark.wend...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question about the numpy.choose method.
I'm working with rgb image arrays (converted using PIL's 'asarray'),
and would like to combine data from multiple images. The choose method
seemed just the thing for what
On 23-May-09, at 4:59 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Otherwise it will just work the way it does now.
That would cause difficulties. Now the format of your data depends on
whether or not you have a package installed. That's not a very good
level of control.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. What I meant
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 16:47, David Warde-Farley d...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
On 23-May-09, at 4:59 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Otherwise it will just work the way it does now.
That would cause difficulties. Now the format of your data depends on
whether or not you have a package installed.
Hi Chris and Charles
2009/5/23 Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
Robert thought that should be the default, but I think that means
everyone would be forced to check how many items they got every time
they read, which is too much code and likely to be forgotten and lead to
errors. So
2009/5/23 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
Hi Chris and Charles
2009/5/23 Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com:
Robert thought that should be the default, but I think that means
everyone would be forced to check how many items they got every time
they read, which is too much
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:43, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Warnings used to warn once and then never again. I once hacked the module to
make it work right but I don't know if it has been officially fixed. Do you
know if it's been fixed?
Warning once per location then
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:43, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Warnings used to warn once and then never again. I once hacked the module
to
make it work right but I don't know if it has been
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:57, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:43, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Warnings used to warn once and then never again. I once
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:57, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
You were supposed to be able to change the default behaviour, but it didn't
used to work. I think if you are going to use a warning as a flag then it
has to always be raised when a failure occurs, not just the
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:57, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
You were supposed to be able to change the default behaviour, but it
didn't
used to work. I think if you are going to use a warning as
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:57, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
You were supposed to be able to
2009/5/24 Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu:
OK, that would work. Although I think a named argument might be a more
transparent way to specify behaviour than setting the warnings.
I agree; using a warning strikes me as an abuse of the warnings
mechanism. Instead of a strict flag, which I find
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 18:57, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
30 matches
Mail list logo
