Re: [Numpy-discussion] building numpy against Cray xt-libsci

2010-07-01 Thread Valene
Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Amir amirnntp at gmail.com wrote: I am trying to build numpy against Cray's xt-libsci library on a Cray XT5. I am getting an error I am hoping for hints on how to resolve: In [1]: import numpy snip

[Numpy-discussion] sum up to a specific value

2010-07-01 Thread Renato Fabbri
hi, i need to find which elements of an array sums up to an specific value any idea of how to do this? best, rf -- GNU/Linux User #479299 skype: fabbri.renato ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] sum up to a specific value

2010-07-01 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:17:50 -0300, Renato Fabbri wrote: i need to find which elements of an array sums up to an specific value any idea of how to do this? Sounds like the knapsack problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knapsack_problem ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.load raising IOError but EOFError expected

2010-07-01 Thread Ruben Salvador
Great! Thanks for all your answers! I actually have the files created as .npy (appending a new array eact time). I know it's weird, and it's not its intended use. But, for whatsoever reasons, I came to use that. No turn back now. Fortunately, I am able to read the files correctly, so being weird

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.load raising IOError but EOFError expected

2010-07-01 Thread V. Armando Solé
Ruben Salvador wrote: Great! Thanks for all your answers! I actually have the files created as .npy (appending a new array eact time). I know it's weird, and it's not its intended use. But, for whatsoever reasons, I came to use that. No turn back now. Fortunately, I am able to read the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] sum up to a specific value

2010-07-01 Thread Vincent Davis
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Renato Fabbri renato.fab...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i need to find which elements of an array sums up to an specific value any idea of how to do this? Not sure if there is a better way but a brut force way would be to a array([[ 7., 5., 9., 3.], [ 7.,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ticket #1223...

2010-07-01 Thread Bruce Southey
On 06/29/2010 11:38 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com mailto:bsout...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM, David Goldsmith d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com mailto:d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] sum up to a specific value

2010-07-01 Thread Renato Fabbri
just a solution (not all of them) and the application happen to come up with something like 10k values in the array. don care waiting, but... 2010/7/1 Vincent Davis vinc...@vincentdavis.net: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Renato Fabbri renato.fab...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i need to find

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ufunc memory access optimization

2010-07-01 Thread Hans Meine
Hi Pauli and Anne, On Tuesday 15 June 2010 13:37:30 Pauli Virtanen wrote: pe, 2010-06-11 kello 10:52 +0200, Hans Meine kirjoitti: At the bottom you can see that he basically wraps all numpy.ufuncs he can find in the numpy top-level namespace automatically. Ok, here's the branch:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] sum up to a specific value

2010-07-01 Thread Pauli Virtanen
to, 2010-07-01 kello 11:46 -0300, Renato Fabbri kirjoitti: just a solution (not all of them) and the application happen to come up with something like 10k values in the array. don care waiting, but... As said, the problem is a well-known one, and it's not really Python or Numpy-specific, so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ticket #1223...

2010-07-01 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/29/2010 11:38 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM, David Goldsmith d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 29,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ticket #1223...

2010-07-01 Thread David Goldsmith
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/29/2010 11:38 PM, David Goldsmith wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jun 29,

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] PyTables 2.2 released: enter the multi-core age

2010-07-01 Thread Francesc Alted
= Announcing PyTables 2.2 (final) = I'm happy to announce PyTables 2.2 (final). After 18 months of continuous development and testing, this is, by far, the most powerful and well-tested release ever. I hope you like it too.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] PyTables 2.2 released: enter the multi-core age

2010-07-01 Thread Francesc Alted
A Thursday 01 July 2010 21:10:42 Francesc Alted escrigué: http://www.pytables.org/download/preliminary Mmh, that should read: http://www.pytables.org/download/stable Sorry for the typo! -- Francesc Alted ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

[Numpy-discussion] Determine slices in a sorted array

2010-07-01 Thread Laszlo Nagy
Given an array with two axes, sorted by a column 'SLICE_BY', how can I extract slice indexes for rows with the same 'SLICE_BY' value? Here is an example program, demonstrating the problem: from numpy import * a = random.randint(0,100,(20,4)) SLICE_BY = 0 # Make slices of array 'a' by column

[Numpy-discussion] where support full broadcasting, right?

2010-07-01 Thread David Goldsmith
Hi. The docstring (in the wiki) for where states: x, y : array_like, optionalValues from which to choose. *x* and *y* need to have the same shape as *condition*.But: x = np.eye(2) np.where(x,2,3) array([[2, 3], [3, 2]]) So apparently where supports broadcasting of scalars at least;

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Bento (ex-toydist) 0.0.3

2010-07-01 Thread David
Hi, I am pleased to announce the release 0.0.3 for Bento, the pythonic packaging solution. Wherease the 0.0.2 release was mostly about getting the simplest-still-useful subset of distutils features, this new release adds quite a few significant features: - Add hooks to customize

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __array__struct__: about using PyCapsule instead of PyCObject for Python 2.7

2010-07-01 Thread Sturla Molden
Lisandro Dalcin skrev: No, no sarcasm at all! I just realized that PyCObject were (pending)deprecated in 2.7 ... Anyway. let me say I'm so annoyed and upset as you. PyCapsule should be used instead. It has two main advantages over PyCObject: First, it associates a 'name' with the void

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.all docstring reality check

2010-07-01 Thread Benjamin Root
This behavior is quite curious. While it is consistent and it behaves exactly as documented (after clarification), I am curious about the rational. Is it merely an unavoidable consequence of passing in the output array? Certainly a few examples from the above emails would make this extremely

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Bento (ex-toydist) 0.0.3

2010-07-01 Thread Robert Pyle
Hi, While I agree that toydist needs a new name, Bento might not be a good choice. It's already the name of a database system for Macintosh from Filemaker, an Apple subsidiary. I'd be *very* surprised if the name Bento is not copyrighted. Have a look at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Bento (ex-toydist) 0.0.3

2010-07-01 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Robert Pyle rp...@post.harvard.edu wrote: Hi, While I agree that toydist needs a new name, Bento might not be a good choice.  It's already the name of a database system for Macintosh from Filemaker, an Apple subsidiary.  I'd be *very* surprised if the name