Hello everyone,
I have a bit of code where I am using rpy2 to import R phyper so I can
perform an hypergeometric test. Unfortunately our cluster does not have a
functional installation of rpy2 working. So I am wondering if I could
translate to scipy which would make the code completly independent
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09, Bruno Santos bacmsan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a bit of code where I am using rpy2 to import R phyper so I can
perform an hypergeometric test. Unfortunately our cluster does not have a
functional installation of rpy2 working. So I am wondering
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09, Bruno Santos bacmsan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a bit of code where I am using rpy2 to import R phyper so I can
perform an hypergeometric test. Unfortunately our cluster
I've done some comparisons of 1.6.1 and 1.7 (master), and written up some
key differences in a pull request here:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/264/files#diff-0
What you've discovered here looks like an interaction between the automatic
unit detection and struct dtypes, it's a bug to do
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have a
look at those PRs to see and comment on what's proposed to go into 1.6.2.
I also have a request for help with testing: can someone who uses
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done some comparisons of 1.6.1 and 1.7 (master), and written up some
key differences in a pull request here:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/264/files#diff-0
What you've discovered here looks like an interaction
The committee of the Euroscipy 2012 conference has extended the deadline
for abstract submission to **Monday May 7th, midnight** (Brussels time).
Up to then, new abstracts may be submitted on
http://www.euroscipy.org/conference/euroscipy2012, and already-submitted
abstracts can be modified.
We
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done some comparisons of 1.6.1 and 1.7 (master), and written up some
key differences in a pull request here:
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have
a look at those PRs to see and comment on what's proposed to go into 1.6.2.
I also have a
Hello all,
NumFOCUS has been working with Continuum Analytics and multiple people in the
community on Continuous Integration services for NumPy.
Right now the tools we are using are:
TeamCity
ShiningPandas
One great thing about Continuous Integration is that you don't have
SciPy 2012 Conference Deadlines Extended
Didn't quite finish your abstract or tutorial yet? Good news: the SciPy
2012 organizers have extended the deadline until Friday, May 4. Proposals
for tutorials and abstracts for talks and posters are now due by midnight
(Austin time, CDT), May 4.
For
On Monday, April 30, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with
Ralf's current list of preferences as:
1) Redmine
2) Trac
3) Github
Since that time,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with
Ralf's current list of preferences as:
1) Redmine
2) Trac
3)
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use Github
issues, then together with IPython we can really be a voice that helps
Github. I will propose to NumFOCUS that the Foundation sponsor migration of
the Trac to Github for NumPy and SciPy.If anyone would like
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have
a look at those
15 matches
Mail list logo
