On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Sorry everyone for being so dense and contaminating that other thread.
Here's a new thread where I can respond to
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:35:26PM -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Basically it buys not forcing *all* NumPy users (on the C-API level) to
now deal with a masked array. I know this push is a feature that is
part of Mark's intention (as it pushes downstream libraries to think about
On 9 May 2012 18:46, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The document is available here:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy.scipy.org/blob/master/NA-overview.rst
This is orthogonal to the discussion, but I'm curious as to why this
discussion document has landed in the website repo?
I
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
Sorry everyone for
On 05/10/2012 06:05 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:01 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/09/2012 06:46 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
Nathaniel and Mark have worked very hard
On 05/10/2012 10:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Dag Sverre
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
The third proposal is certainly the best one from Cython's perspective;
and I imagine for those writing C extensions against the C API too.
Having PyType_Check fail for ndmasked is a very good way of
On 05/10/2012 11:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
On 05/10/2012 10:40 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.nomailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:18 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Dear all,
I have files which contain lines like this:
30516F5 Sep1985 1-Day RainTrace 0.23.2 Trace 0.0
0.00.00.00.20.0 Trace 29.20.00.00.0
0.01.8
30516F5 Sep1985 1-Day SnowTrace 0.00.00.0 14.8
10.1 Trace 0.00.0
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my glorified
double*. I'm probably not a representative user.)
Actually, I think you are representative of a LOT of users -- it
turns,
On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my glorified
double*. I'm probably not a representative user.)
Actually, I think you
On May 10, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my glorified
double*. I'm probably not a representative user.)
Actually, I
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Ransom sran...@nrao.edu wrote:
On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Scott Ransom sran...@nrao.edu wrote:
On 05/10/2012 02:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my glorified
double*. I'm probably not a representative user.)
Actually, I
Just noticed this in the output from printing some numpy record arrays:
[[('2008081712', -24, -78.0, 20.10381469727, 45.0, -999.0, 0.0)]
[ ('2008081718', -18, -79.584741211, 20.70762939453, 45.0, -999.0,
0.0)]
[ ('2008081800', -12, -80.3305175781, 21.10381469727, 45.0,
On 05/10/2012 08:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I want is my glorified
double*. I'm probably not a representative user.)
Actually, I think you
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/10/2012 08:23 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
What would serve me? I use NumPy as a glorified double*.
all I
On 05/11/2012 12:28 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I did some searching for typical Cython and C code which accesses numpy
arrays, and added a section to the NEP describing how they behave in the
current implementation. Cython code which uses either straight Python
access or the buffer protocol is fine
On 05/11/2012 01:06 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/11/2012 12:28 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I did some searching for typical Cython and C code which accesses
numpy
Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 05/11/2012 01:06 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no
wrote:
On 05/11/2012 12:28 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I did some
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
The third proposal is certainly the best one from Cython's perspective;
and I imagine for those writing C extensions against
On May 10, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Scott Sinclair wrote:
On 9 May 2012 18:46, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
The document is available here:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy.scipy.org/blob/master/NA-overview.rst
This is orthogonal to the discussion, but I'm curious as to why this
On May 10, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, May 9, 2012, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
My only objection to this proposal is that committing to this approach
seems premature. The existing
I guess this mixture of Python-API and C-API is different from the way
the API tries to protect incorrect access. From the Python API, it.
should let everything through, because it's for Python code to use. From
the C API, it should default to not letting things through, because
special
On 05/11/2012 07:36 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
I guess this mixture of Python-API and C-API is different from the way
the API tries to protect incorrect access. From the Python API, it.
should let everything through, because it's for Python code to use. From
the C API, it should default to
26 matches
Mail list logo
