Hi,
I noticed that on
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.savez.html
there's a see also to a function numpy.savez_compressed, which doesn't
seem to exist (neither on my system nor in the online documentation).
What would be the easiest way to find out where to fix this? For
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that on
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.savez.html
there's a see also to a function numpy.savez_compressed, which doesn't
seem to exist (neither on my system nor in the online
On 5 February 2013 10:38, Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de wrote:
I noticed that on
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.savez.html
there's a see also to a function numpy.savez_compressed, which doesn't
seem to exist (neither on my system nor in the online documentation).
Hello all,
Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release
candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be safe for me to release a Windows
installer for a package using the NumPy C API compiled against
the NumPy 1.7.0rc?
I'm specifically interested in Python 3.3, and NumPy 1.7 will be
the
On 02/04/2013 06:09 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
The problem with not providing these binaries is that they are at the
bottom of everyone's stack, so a delay in numpy holds everyone back.
OTOH, so far it's been an *excellent* excuse for those of us further up
the stack not to make a 64-bit
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.gov wrote:
On 02/04/2013 06:09 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
The problem with not providing these binaries is that they are at the
bottom of everyone's stack, so a delay in numpy holds everyone back.
OTOH, so far it's been an
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Matthew Brett
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello all,
Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release
candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be safe for me to release a Windows
installer for a package using the NumPy C API compiled against
the NumPy
Hi All,
This post is to bring the discussion of PR
#2965https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2965to the attention of the
list. There are at least three issues in play here.
1) The PR adds modes 'big' and 'thin' to the current modes 'full', 'r',
'economic' for qr factorization. The problem is that
On 2/5/2013 10:51 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 2/5/2013 10:51 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Numpy-MKL requires the Intel runtime DLLs (MKL is linked statically
btw). I ship those with the installers and append the directory
containing the DLLs to os.environ['PATH'] in numpy/__init__.py. This is
a big
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Numpy-MKL requires the Intel runtime DLLs (MKL is linked statically
btw). I ship those with the installers and append the
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello all,
Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release
candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be safe for me to release a
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
This post is to bring the discussion of PR
#2965https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2965to the attention of the list.
There are at least three issues in play here.
1) The PR adds modes 'big' and
On 2/4/13 12:04 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
Here are the last open issues for 1.7, there are 9 of them:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?milestone=3sort=updatedstate=open
Here's something we noticed while working on getting 1.7rc1 into Sage
with one of our doctests. With numpy 1.5.1
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
On 2/4/13 12:04 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
Here are the last open issues for 1.7, there are 9 of them:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?milestone=3sort=updatedstate=open
Here's something we
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
On 2/4/13 12:04 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi,
Here are the last open issues for 1.7, there are 9 of them:
On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
if we decide to do so
I should mention that we don't really depend on either behavior (we
probably should have a better doctest testing for an array of None
values anyway), but we noticed the oddity and thought we ought to
mention it. So it doesn't
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
On 2/6/13 12:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
if we decide to do so
I should mention that we don't really depend on either behavior (we
probably should have a better doctest testing for an array of None
values
20 matches
Mail list logo
