Hi all,
First time posting.
I've been working on a class for solving a group of affine models and
decided to drop down to C for a portion of the code for improved
performance.
There are two questions that I've had come up from this.
1) I've written the section of code, which involved a series
On 12 November 2013 12:01, Bart Baker bart...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is that there are some minor (10^-16) differences in the
values when I do the calculation in C vs Python.
That is the order of the machine epsilon for double, that looks like
roundoff errors to me.
I found similar
On 12.11.2013 03:17, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi there,
I have noticed more and more subtle and hard to track serious bugs in
numpy and scipy, due to the use of advanced optimization features
(flags, or gcc intrinsics).
I am wondering whether those are worth it: they compile wrongly under
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime
problems.
What needs to be done, and what is the plan forward?
I'm not sure that's quite been decided, but my take:
1) remove the existing time zone
Hi,
On 03.11.2013, at 5:42PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release candidate of Numpy 1.7.2.
This is a bugfix only release supporting Python 2.4 - 2.7 and 3.1 - 3.3.
on OS X 10.5, build and tests succeed for Python 2.5-3.3, but Python 2.4.4
Am 10.11.13 23:27, schrieb Charles R Harris:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christian K. ckk...@hoc.net
mailto:ckk...@hoc.net wrote:
Am 10.11.13 21:06, schrieb Christian K.:
Am 03.11.13 13:42, schrieb Julian Taylor:
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the release
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
Hi,
On 03.11.2013, at 5:42PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release candidate of Numpy 1.7.2.
This is a bugfix only release supporting Python 2.4 -
The issue is that there are some minor (10^-16) differences in the
values when I do the calculation in C vs Python.
That is the order of the machine epsilon for double, that looks like roundoff
errors to me.
Hi Daπid,
Thanks for the reply. That does make sense.
I'm trying to my
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Derek Homeier
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
Hi,
On 03.11.2013, at 5:42PM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm happy to announce the
Hi,
yes it also works for scipy. I didn't patch the scipy source other than
creating site.cfg with the path to openblas.I will upload the binaries and
logs later today.
Regards
Carl
scipy.test(verbose=2) runs without segfault:
...
10 matches
Mail list logo