On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On 19/11/13 16:08, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>>> >However, FFTW is dual licensed GPL/commercial and so the wrappers are
>>> >also GPL by necessity.
>> I'm not sure if that is true
On 19/11/13 16:08, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>> >However, FFTW is dual licensed GPL/commercial and so the wrappers are
>> >also GPL by necessity.
> I'm not sure if that is true, strictly speaking--you may license your
> wrapper code under
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> However, FFTW is dual licensed GPL/commercial and so the wrappers are
> also GPL by necessity.
I'm not sure if that is true, strictly speaking--you may license your
wrapper code under any license you wish. It's just that it becomes
confus
On 19/11/13 16:00, Charles Waldman wrote:
> How about FFTW? I think there are wrappers out there for that ...
Yes there are! (complete with the numpy.fft API)
https://github.com/hgomersall/pyFFTW
However, FFTW is dual licensed GPL/commercial and so the wrappers are
also GPL by necessity.
Cheer
How about FFTW? I think there are wrappers out there for that ...
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Oscar Benjamin <
> oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 November 2013 17:19, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 14
