On 8 Feb 2014 04:51, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
>
>> Members of the dipy team would also be interested.
>
> That's specifically for the spherical harmonics topic right?
Right. Spherical harmonics are used as bases in many of DiPy's
reconstruction algorithms.
You are right, though, that gsoc would al
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:21:58 +0100, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Finding a suitable mentor for whatever project Jennifer chooses is an
> > important factor in the choice of project, so I have to ask: do you have
> > the bandwidth to be a men
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Matthieu Brucher
>> wrote:
>>> According to the discussions on the ML, they switched from GPL to MPL
>>> to enable the kind of distribution numpy/scipy
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Matthieu Brucher
> wrote:
>> According to the discussions on the ML, they switched from GPL to MPL
>> to enable the kind of distribution numpy/scipy is looking for. They
>> had some hesitations between BSD and MP
Thomas Unterthiner wrote:
> Sorry for going a bit off-topic, but: do you have any links to the
> benchmarks? I googled around, but I haven't found anything. FWIW, on my
> own machines OpenBLAS is on par with MKL (on an i5 laptop and an older
> Xeon server) and actually slightly faster than A
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Matthieu Brucher
wrote:
> According to the discussions on the ML, they switched from GPL to MPL
> to enable the kind of distribution numpy/scipy is looking for. They
> had some hesitations between BSD and MPL, but IIRC their official
> stand is to allow inclusion in
