Hi,
I am trying to install numpy 1.9.0 on OS X Lion 10.7.5 and I get the
same error as reported in this old thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/47711/
that is,
numpy/core/src/npymath/npy_math_private.h:78:3: error: conflicting types
for
On 15.10.2014 16:21, Nicola wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install numpy 1.9.0 on OS X Lion 10.7.5 and I get the
same error as reported in this old thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/47711/
...
^
no matter whether I use the system's clang or gcc 4.9
In article 543eac76.7070...@googlemail.com,
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 15.10.2014 16:21, Nicola wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install numpy 1.9.0 on OS X Lion 10.7.5 and I get the
same error as reported in this old thread:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Fadzil Mnor fadzilmno...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been trying to install IRIS on my laptop (OS X) for months. Errors
everywhere.
I'll look at that IRIS again, and other links.
IRIS has been an install challeng,e but gotten better.
And you ay even find a conda
Sorry about SWIG -- maybe a chance to move on ;-)
I'd go with Cython -- this is pretty straightforward, and it handles the
buffer protocol for you under the hood.
And with XDress, you can get numpy wrapped std::vector out of the box, I
think:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/xdress/index.html
if you
On 15.10.2014 21:48, Chris Barker wrote:
Sorry about SWIG -- maybe a chance to move on ;-)
I'd go with Cython -- this is pretty straightforward, and it handles
the buffer protocol for you under the hood.
+1
All the standard containers are automatically wrapped and C++ exceptions
can be
Stephen is being a bit modest by putting xray last in the list. I recommend
it, and it is very painless to install. I could only get iris installed via
a SciTools repo on binstar and even then, I had to tinker with a few things
to get it working (and it was only the linux binaries, too).
Ben Root
Thanks for confirming that I'm not the only one having trouble with IRIS
installation. Such a pain!
Back to the first question, I figured that the NCEP Reanalysis data has
the y axis from 90N to 90S, means the indexing started from north (90),
not south (-90), which means that my calculation was
