On 22.10.2014 05:52, Daniel Hyams wrote:
I would have thought that this snippet would raise an exception:
import numpy
numpy.seterr(all='raise')
a = numpy.array([1.0,0.0,-1.0])
b = numpy.log(a)
I get as a result (in b): [0, -Inf, NaN]
It's basically the same issue as:
Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com writes:
What platform are you using?
whether you get exceptions or not depends on your math library.
Windows 7.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
I guess we could make this more consistent by hand if we wanted - isnan is
pretty cheap?
On 22 Oct 2014 07:44, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 22.10.2014 05:52, Daniel Hyams wrote:
I would have thought that this snippet would raise an exception:
import numpy
On 22 October 2014 15:43, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess we could make this more consistent by hand if we wanted - isnan is
pretty cheap?
Can it be made avoiding storing the full bool array? The 1/8 memory
overhead can be problematic for large arrays.
On 22 Oct 2014 14:57, Daπid davidmen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 October 2014 15:43, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
I guess we could make this more consistent by hand if we wanted - isnan
is pretty cheap?
Can it be made avoiding storing the full bool array? The 1/8 memory
overhead
Hello,
Is this desired behaviour or a regression or a bug?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26497656/how-do-i-align-a-numpy-record-array-recarray
Thanks,
Neil
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Neil Girdhar mistersh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is this desired behaviour or a regression or a bug?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26497656/how-do-i-align-a-numpy-record-array-recarray
Thanks,
I'd guess that the definition of aligned may have
On 22.10.2014 20:00, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Neil Girdhar mistersh...@gmail.com
mailto:mistersh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is this desired behaviour or a regression or a bug?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 22.10.2014 20:00, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Neil Girdhar mistersh...@gmail.com
mailto:mistersh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is this desired behaviour or
* Either windows sdk 7 or ms visual studio 2008 is required, however Fortran
compilers are not.* Download acml5.3.1-ifort64.exe from
http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/amd-core-math-library-acml/acml-downloads-resources/
and it extracts to c:\AMD\acml5.3.1
* NOTE: There is
Not sure if folks saw this one... Might be interesting to contact this team
from the python side of things.
Cheers
f
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zhang Xianyi traits.zh...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:50 AM
Subject: [julia-dev] OpenBLAS machines
To: Julia Dev
Michael,
Thanks for your response.
The Intel Math Kernel Library package with just the static and dynamic
libraries for blas, lapack (similar to AMD's acml self extracting zip file) is
what I think many Windows users were depending on to build Python's numerical
and scientific libraries
12 matches
Mail list logo
