Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 14:13 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote: On So, 2015-04-05 at 00:45 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río snip A PR it is, #5749 to be precise. I think it has all the bells and whistles: integers, boolean and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 00:45 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río snip A PR it is, #5749 to be precise. I think it has all the bells and whistles: integers, boolean and integer 1-D arrays, slices, ellipsis, and even newaxis, both for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 5, 2015 3:09 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such platforms,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2015-04-05 at 07:08 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Just to raise the question if these

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Fr, 2015-04-03 at 21:00 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Just to raise the question if these two options should be removed at some point? The current default value for both is 0, so we have separate compilation and relaxed strides checking by default. I still have some small

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Jaime Fernández del Río
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote: I have an all-Pyhton implementation of an OrthogonalIndexer class, loosely based on Stephan's code plus some axis remapping, that provides all the needed functionality for getting and setting with orthogonal

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NPY_SEPARATE_COMPILATION and RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING

2015-04-05 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: IIRC there allegedly exist platforms where separate compilation doesn't work right? I'm happy to get rid of it if no one speaks up to defend such platforms, though, we can always add it back later. One case was for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Advanced indexing: fancy vs. orthogonal

2015-04-05 Thread Robert Kern
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Apr 4, 2015 4:12 AM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 4, 2015 10:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Core python broke backcompat on a regular basis throughout the python 2 series, and almost