On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Alexander Belopolsky ndar...@mac.com wrote:
1. Is there a simple expression using existing numpy functions that
implements PEP 465 semantics for @?
Not yet.
2. Suppose I have a function that takes two vectors x and y, and a matrix M
and returns
1. Is there a simple expression using existing numpy functions that
implements PEP 465 semantics for @?
2. Suppose I have a function that takes two vectors x and y, and a matrix M
and returns x.dot(M.dot(y)). I would like to vectorize this function so
that it works with x and y of any ndim = 1
