Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Ryan May
Yup. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Steve Waterbury wrote: > Me 3! ;) > > Steve > > > On 05/18/2016 06:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > Me too. > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker > wrote: > > I'll be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Steve Waterbury
Me 3! ;) Steve On 05/18/2016 06:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Me too. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote: I'll be there. -CHB On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Out of curiosity, who all

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Me too. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > I'll be there. > > -CHB > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016? >> >> Chuck

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Chris Barker
I'll be there. -CHB On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016? > > Chuck > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list >

[Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2016 attending

2016-05-18 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Out of curiosity, who all here intends to be at Scipy 2016? Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Robert Kern >> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread Robert Kern
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> >> >> >> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread josef.pktd
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker > wrote: > >> > >> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid > >> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API, >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread Robert Kern
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >> >> > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid >> > engineering reasons why users *want* this API, > > Honestly, I am lost in the math -- but like any good engineer, I want to accomplish

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread Chris Barker
> > > ...anyway, the real reason I'm a bit grumpy is because there are solid > > engineering reasons why users *want* this API, > Honestly, I am lost in the math -- but like any good engineer, I want to accomplish something anyway :-) I trust you guys to get this right -- or at least document

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: numpy.random.random_seed

2016-05-18 Thread Robert Kern
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Robert Kern wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> On May 17, 2016 1:50 AM, "Robert Kern"